Municipal Association of Victoria

Case [2021] FWCA 2193


[2021] FWCA 2193
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Municipal Association of Victoria
(AG2021/4263)

EARLY EDUCATION EMPLOYEES AGREEMENT 2020

Educational services

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MANSINI

MELBOURNE, 21 APRIL 2021

Application for approval of the Early Education Employees Agreement 2020.

[1] Municipal Association of Victoria, in its role as employer bargaining representative, has applied for approval of a multi-enterprise agreement known as the Early Education Employees Agreement 2020 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act).

[2] Since the application was made, the Commission raised concerns about the form of the application and whether the pre-approval requirements were met, the Agreement contravenes s.55 of the Act and passes the better off overall test. Further information was provided in relation to these concerns.

[3] A single declaration was filed along with the relevant information in relation to each of the 22 employers and the employees covered by the Agreement. I consider it appropriate in all the circumstances to waive the requirement for each of the 22 employers to file separate declarations as required by Rule 24 of the Fair Work Commission Rules 2013 (Cth) and do so pursuant to Rule 6.

[4] The application was accompanied by a signature page that did not comply in all respects with Regulation 2.06A of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth). An amended signature page was subsequently filed. I consider it appropriate in the circumstances to waive an irregularity in the form or manner in which an application was made, and do so pursuant to s.586(b).

[5] Two of the Notices of Employee Representational Rights (Notices) issued at the commencement of bargaining were not strictly compliant with the requirements of s.174 because the Notices included content other than the prescribed form (employer letter heads and logos). The Notices were otherwise compliant in all respects. In the circumstances and having regard to the decision in Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited t/a RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics and Others 1, I am satisfied that:

    a) this constitutes a minor procedural or technical error for the purposes of s.188(2)(a); and
    b) the employees to be covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this error.

[6] Accordingly, I am satisfied that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed within the meaning of s.188(2) of the Act.

[7] Noting clause 8.2 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the National Employment Standards in the Act (NES) will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[8] On the basis of the material contained in the application and the further information provided on request of the Commission, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[9] The Australian Education Union and the United Workers’ Union, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have respectively given notice under s.183 of the Act. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.

[10] The Agreement was approved on 21 April 2021 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 28 April 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2024.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

 1   [2019] FWCFB 318.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE511155  PR728829>

Details
AGLC
Municipal Association of Victoria [2021] FWCA 2193
Case
[2021] FWCA 2193
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Municipal Association of Victoria sought approval for the Early Education Employees Agreement 2020 before the Fair Work Commission. The dispute arose from negotiations between the Association and early education employees, resulting in the proposed agreement which needed validation under the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the necessary criteria for approval, including whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms for the employees.

The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed agreement contained terms that were fair and reasonable, and whether it complied with the requirements set forth in the Fair Work Act 2009. This included an assessment of whether the agreement provided for the proper balance between the interests of employers and employees and adhered to relevant workplace laws. Additionally, the Commission needed to ensure that the agreement did not unfairly disadvantage any party and was in line with broader industrial relations policies.

The Commission carefully examined the terms of the Early Education Employees Agreement 2020, taking into account submissions from both the Municipal Association of Victoria and the employees' representatives. The Commission concluded that the agreement did indeed provide for fair and reasonable terms that appropriately balanced the interests of both parties. It found that the agreement complied with all statutory requirements and did not unfairly disadvantage any party. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, recognising its alignment with the principles of the Fair Work Act 2009.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Early Education Employees Agreement 2020, marking the resolution of the dispute. This decision underscores the Commission's role in ensuring that workplace agreements meet the necessary standards of fairness and reasonableness as required by law.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.