| [2019] FWCA 3706 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
MultiTek Solutions Pty Ltd T/A MultiTek Solutions
(AG2018/6666)
MULTITEK SOLUTIONS PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019-2022
Electrical contracting industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MILLHOUSE | MELBOURNE, 30 MAY 2019 |
Application for approval of the MultiTek Solutions Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2019-2022.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the MultiTek Solutions Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2019-2022 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by MultiTek Solutions Pty Ltd T/A MultiTek Solutions (Employer). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 6 June 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 May 2023.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE503654 PR708807>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- MultiTek Solutions Pty Ltd T/A MultiTek Solutions [2019] FWCA 3706
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 3706
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the enterprise agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act, particularly in terms of the process by which it was negotiated, the fairness of its provisions, and its compliance with the procedural fairness requirements. The court needed to consider whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated between the employer and the employees and whether it contained terms that were fair and reasonable in all circumstances. Additionally, the court had to examine if the process leading to the agreement was transparent and whether it adhered to the principles of procedural fairness.
The Fair Work Commission determined that the enterprise agreement was indeed fairly negotiated and complied with the necessary legal standards. The court found that the agreement had been reached through a genuine negotiation process, involving meaningful discussions between the employer and the union representatives. Furthermore, the terms of the agreement were deemed fair and reasonable, taking into account the specific circumstances of the employees and the employer. The court also confirmed that the process leading to the agreement was transparent and adhered to procedural fairness principles. Based on these findings, the Fair Work Commission approved the enterprise agreement, allowing it to be legally binding between the employer and the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.