MUHAMMAD & SARTORE
Case
•
[2019] FamCA 182
•29 March 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
MUHAMMAD & SARTORE [2019] FamCA 182
[2019] FamCA 182
29 March 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned parenting orders made by Hannam J in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. The dispute involved the arrangements for the child, X, born in 2010, between her mother and father.
The court was required to determine the specific terms of equal shared parental responsibility, including the schedule for the child's time with each parent during school terms and holidays, as well as arrangements for Christmas periods. Additionally, the court addressed practical matters such as changeover locations, communication protocols between parents, and restrictions on denigration of each other.
The orders reflect a consent agreement between the parties, with the court formalising these arrangements. Key principles applied included the paramountcy of the child's welfare, as evidenced by the detailed time arrangements and the prohibition on denigration. The court also made orders concerning the child's exposure to media, the father's ability to collect the child from school, and the role of an Independent Children's Lawyer in explaining the orders to the child.
The final orders established equal shared parental responsibility, detailed a complex schedule for the child's time with each parent, and included specific prohibitions and requirements regarding parental conduct and communication. The child was also to be removed from the Airport Watch List.
The court was required to determine the specific terms of equal shared parental responsibility, including the schedule for the child's time with each parent during school terms and holidays, as well as arrangements for Christmas periods. Additionally, the court addressed practical matters such as changeover locations, communication protocols between parents, and restrictions on denigration of each other.
The orders reflect a consent agreement between the parties, with the court formalising these arrangements. Key principles applied included the paramountcy of the child's welfare, as evidenced by the detailed time arrangements and the prohibition on denigration. The court also made orders concerning the child's exposure to media, the father's ability to collect the child from school, and the role of an Independent Children's Lawyer in explaining the orders to the child.
The final orders established equal shared parental responsibility, detailed a complex schedule for the child's time with each parent, and included specific prohibitions and requirements regarding parental conduct and communication. The child was also to be removed from the Airport Watch List.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Consent
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
MUHAMMAD & SARTORE [2019] FamCA 182
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
9
Statutory Material Cited
1
Deiter & Deiter
[2011] FamCAFC 82
M v M
[1988] HCA 68
M v M
[1988] HCA 68