IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NG 398 of 1998
BETWEEN:
PHENSRI MUANGNOI
APPLICANT
AND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND
ETHNIC AFFAIRSRESPONDENT
JUDGE:
SACKVILLE J.
DATE:
28 JULY, 1998
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
HIS HONOUR: In this matter, the Minister applies pursuant to Federal Court Rules, O 10 r 3(2) to dismiss the application on the basis that the applicant has not appeared at this directions hearing. The circumstances of this case are very similar to those dealt with in matter NG397 of 1998, in which I have just delivered judgment.
The only significant differences are that the first directions hearing in this matter was before me on 28 May 1998, rather than before another Judge of the Court on the following day. In addition, in this matter, there was no conversation similar to that which took place on 5 June 1998 to which I have referred in the other judgment. Otherwise the circumstances are, in substance, identical. In particular, the applicant has failed to appear in this Court on three separate occasions. This is so, notwithstanding that on 29 May 1998, the solicitor for the Minister wrote to the applicant advising her of the next directions hearing on 18 June 1998 and stating that she should attend that directions hearing in person if she did not have a legal representative.
As far as today is concerned, the notice of motion and supporting affidavit have been served upon the applicant at her address for service. In these circumstances I consider it clear that the applicant is not willing to pursue her application for review in this Court in a timely manner. I think that the appropriate order in the circumstances is to dismiss the application and to make an order confirming the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal made on 17 April 1998. Accordingly, in matter NG398 of 1998, the orders that I make are:
(1)The application be dismissed.
(2)The decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal made on 17 April 1998 not to grant a protection visa, be confirmed.
(3)The applicant pay the respondent's costs.
I certify that this and the preceding one (1) pages are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Sackville J.
Associate:
Dated: 28 July, 1998
Applicant: Unrepresented Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor Date of Hearing: 28 July, 1998 Date of Judgment: 28 July, 1998
- AGLC
- Muangnoi, Phensri v Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1998] FCA 905
- Case
- [1998] FCA 905
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the applicant had not appeared at three separate directions hearings, despite being advised to attend in person if she did not have legal representation. The court considered the applicant's failure to appear to be a clear indication that she was not willing to pursue her application in a timely manner. As such, the court dismissed the application and confirmed the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal not to grant a protection visa. The court also ordered the applicant to pay the respondent's costs.
The court's decision was based on the principle that a party who fails to prosecute their case in a timely manner may have their application dismissed. The court found that the applicant's failure to appear at the directions hearings demonstrated a lack of willingness to pursue her application. The court also noted that the applicant had been given notice of the directions hearing and had been advised to attend in person if she did not have legal representation. The court considered these factors in determining that the application should be dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.