MTH v State of New South Wales (No 2)

Case

[2025] NSWCA 123

06 June 2025


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
MTH v State of New South Wales (No 2) [2025] NSWCA 123 [2025] NSWCA 123 06 June 2025

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The proceeding concerned an application for the recusal of Price AJA, brought by the third respondent, on the grounds of apprehended bias. The application was heard by Mitchelmore and Adamson JJA.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether there was a reasonable apprehension of bias on the part of Price AJA, such that his Honour ought to recuse himself from hearing the matter.

The Court considered the principles governing apprehended bias, which require an objective assessment of whether a fair-minded lay observer, knowing the relevant facts, would apprehend that the judge might not bring an impartial mind to the issues the judge is to decide. Applying these principles, the Court found that the grounds advanced by the third respondent did not establish a reasonable apprehension of bias.

Accordingly, the Court dismissed the third respondent’s application that Price AJA recuse himself.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Natural Justice

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Appeal

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Cited

20

Statutory Material Cited

1

Charisteas v Charisteas [2021] HCA 29
Charisteas v Charisteas [2021] HCA 29
Charisteas v Charisteas [2021] HCA 29