Ms Kathleen McInnes
Case
•
[2014] FWC 1395
•24 MARCH 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Ms Kathleen McInnes [2014] FWC 1395
[2014] FWC 1395
24 MARCH 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Ms Kathleen McInnes applied to the Fair Work Commission for an order to stop bullying at her workplace. This application was dismissed by the Commission, which led to an appeal to the Full Bench of the Commission. The Full Bench dismissed the appeal, and Ms McInnes sought further review from the Federal Court. The central issue was whether the Full Bench had jurisdiction to hear Ms McInnes’ appeal. This required determining whether the workplace in question was constitutionally covered, specifically whether it was a constitutional corporation.
The court examined whether the community services organisation in question was a constitutional corporation, considering it a trading corporation. The nature of its funding and activities was crucial in this assessment. The organisation received funding from the government for both contract services and grants to support programs. The court found that the funded activities lacked a trading character, as the primary purpose was not commercial. Additionally, any trading activities were deemed insignificant, peripheral, and incidental. Consequently, the organisation did not meet the criteria of a trading corporation. The court held that without being a constitutional corporation, the workplace was not constitutionally covered, and thus, the Full Bench lacked jurisdiction. The application for review was dismissed.
The court examined whether the community services organisation in question was a constitutional corporation, considering it a trading corporation. The nature of its funding and activities was crucial in this assessment. The organisation received funding from the government for both contract services and grants to support programs. The court found that the funded activities lacked a trading character, as the primary purpose was not commercial. Additionally, any trading activities were deemed insignificant, peripheral, and incidental. Consequently, the organisation did not meet the criteria of a trading corporation. The court held that without being a constitutional corporation, the workplace was not constitutionally covered, and thus, the Full Bench lacked jurisdiction. The application for review was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Judicial Review
-
Constitutional Validity
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Ms Kathleen McInnes [2014] FWC 1395
Most Recent Citation
Mr Martin Cooper [2017] FWC 5974
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Mr Martin Cooper
[2017] FWC 5974
Ms Marie Pasalskyj
[2015] FWC 7309
YH v Centre
[2014] FWC 8905
Cases Cited
11
Statutory Material Cited
0
Re McInnes
[2014] FWCFB 1440
Re Dalco; Ex parte Dalco v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
[1986] FCA 357
Australian Wool Innovation Ltd v Newkirk
[2005] FCA 290