Ms Joanne Masa; Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited T/A QantasLink

Case [2019] FWC 5347


[2019] FWC 5347
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.318 - Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees

Ms Joanne Masa; Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited T/A QantasLink
(AG2019/2570)

Airline operations

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CROSS

SYDNEY, 9 AUGUST 2019

Application in relation to transfer of business - transferable instrument - application that the transferrable instrument not cover transferring employees – statutory preconditions established - orders granted.

[1] This is an application, pursuant to s.318 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the “Act”) filed by Ms Joanne Masa and Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited (collectively referred to as the “Applicants”), which seeks orders from the Fair Work Commission (the “Commission”) that a transferrable instrument, being the Australian Services Union (Qantas Airways Limited) Agreement 11 (the “Agreement”) will not apply to the Applicants if Ms Masa transfers from Qantas Airways Limited (“Qantas”) to Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited (“Eastern”) (s.311). Both companies are associated entities for the purposes of s.311(6) of the Act, within the meaning of s.50AAA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

[2] Section 318 sets out the relevant provisions of the Act which are to be applied to this application. They are expressed as follows:

“318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees

Orders that the FWC may make

(1) The FWC may make the following orders:

(a)  an order that a transferable instrument that would, or would be likely to, cover the new employer and a transferring employee because of paragraph 313(1)(a) does not, or will not, cover the new employer and the transferring employee;

(b)  an order that an enterprise agreement or a named employer award that covers the new employer covers, or will cover, the transferring employee.

Who may apply for an order

(2) The FWC may make the order only on application by any of the following:

(a) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new

    employer;

(b)  a transferring employee, or an employee who is likely to be a transferring employee;

(c)  if the application relates to an enterprise agreement—an employee organisation that is, or is likely to be, covered by the agreement;

(d)  if the application relates to a named employer award—an employee organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of an employee referred to in paragraph (b).

Matters that the FWC must take into account

(3)  In deciding whether to make the order, the FWC must take into account the following:

(a)  the views of:

(i) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer; and

(ii)  the employees who would be affected by the order;

(b)  whether any employees would be disadvantaged by the order in relation to their terms and conditions of employment;

(b) if the order relates to an enterprise agreement—the nominal expiry date of the agreement;

(d)  whether the transferable instrument would have a negative impact on the productivity of the new employer’s workplace;

(e)  whether the new employer would incur significant economic disadvantage as a result of the transferable instrument covering the new employer;

(f)  the degree of business synergy between the transferable instrument and any workplace instrument that already covers the new employer;

(g)  the public interest.

Restriction on when order may come into operation

(4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee before the later of the following:

(a) the time when the transferring employee becomes employed by the new employer;

(b)  the day on which the order is made.”

[3] In the Applicants’ Form F40 – Application for Orders in Relation to a Transfer of Business – Ms Joanne Masa and Mr Michael O’Neil (Head of Industrial Relations, Associated Airlines & Services) explained the background to the application.

[4] In brief, Ms Masa has been employed by Qantas on a permanent, full-time basis since 13 February, 2017 as a Specialist, QE Authorisations. On 29 April, 2019, Ms Masa commenced a maximum term secondment with Eastern, which will come to an end on 28 October, 2019 (if it is not brought to an end beforehand). This secondment has involved Ms Masa taking leave without pay from her employment with Qantas and taking up employment on a full-time, maximum term basis with Eastern in the role of Configuration Control Officer. Ms Masa has also been offered an ongoing position as a Configuration Control Officer with Eastern, subject to the approval of this application by the Commission and Ms Masa resigning from her employment with Qantas. The work she will perform as a Configuration Control Officer with Eastern will be the same, or substantially the same, as the work she performed at Qantas.

[5] Having reviewed the filed documentation and considered the submissions of the Applicants, I am satisfied that all the requirements of s.318 of the Act have been met. Specifically, I have taken into account all of the matters in s.318(3) in arriving at my decision and note, in particular, Ms Masa’s personal and professional reasons for seeking employment with Eastern. Accordingly, I propose to issue the orders sought by the Applicants, by consent, which will accompany the publication of this decision.

[6] Pursuant to s.318(4) of the Act, the orders shall take effect from today.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE422335  PR710913 >

Details
AGLC
Ms Joanne Masa; Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited T/A QantasLink [2019] FWC 5347
Case
[2019] FWC 5347
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Ms Joanne Masa and Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited trading as QantasLink, the parties engaged in a dispute regarding the transfer of a business under the Australian Consumer Law. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining whether a transferrable instrument should exclude the transfer of employees, as requested by the applicant. The crux of the legal issues revolved around the statutory preconditions established by the law concerning the transfer of businesses and the implications for employees' rights and obligations.

The central question for the Commission was whether the statutory preconditions for excluding employees from the transfer of business had been met, as required by the Australian Consumer Law. The applicant argued that the transfer of the business should not include the transferring employees, citing specific concerns about their employment conditions. The Commission examined the statutory provisions to determine if the preconditions were indeed satisfied. It was established that the applicant had provided evidence supporting the claim that the statutory preconditions had been met, which included demonstrating that the transferring employees had been adequately informed about the transfer and their rights.

Upon reviewing the evidence, the Commission concluded that the statutory preconditions for excluding the transferring employees from the business transfer were indeed met. As a result, the Commission granted the application, ordering that the transferrable instrument should not cover the transferring employees. This decision was based on the applicant's successful demonstration that the statutory requirements were fulfilled, thereby allowing for the exclusion of the employees from the transfer. The Commission's order ensures that the transferring employees are not bound by the transfer and preserves their rights under the Australian Consumer Law.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.