| [2015] FWC 8496 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.318 - Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees
Mr Simon Haddad and Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited
(AG2015/6302)
Airline operations | |
COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE | SYDNEY, 11 DECEMBER 2015 |
Application for an Order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees.
[1] This matter involves an application made under section 318 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The application has been made by Mr Simon Haddad and Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited (Eastern). Simon Haddad is an employee of Qantas Ground Services Pty Limited (QGS).
[2] The application was lodged at Sydney on 26 November 2015. The application seeks an Order from the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) relating to Simon Haddad who is an employee of QGS and a prospective employee of Eastern.
[3] The application contains grounds and submissions which, in relevant summary, contend that:
- Simon Haddad is currently employed by QGS under the terms of the Qantas Ground Services Pty Limited Ground Handling Agreement 2013 (the QGS Agreement);
- Simon Haddad has been offered and he has accepted employment with Eastern;
- The employment of a person performing the work that Simon Haddad will perform with Eastern is not regulated by an industrial instrument;
- There is an association between QGS and Eastern and a transfer of business from QGS to Eastern in satisfaction of the meaning of transfer of business contained in Division 2 of Part 2-8 of the Act, will occur when Simon Haddad commences employment with Eastern as is anticipated;
- The terms and conditions of employment for Simon Haddad with Eastern are considered to be, over time, more beneficial overall for Simon Haddad than the terms applicable under the QGS Agreement; and
- In the absence of the Order sought by the application, the QGS Agreement would be likely to cover Simon Haddad as a transferring employee and bind Eastern as a new employer.
[4] The matter was listed for a Hearing in Chambers on 11 December 2015. In the absence of any objection to the application, I have proceeded to determine the matter by reference to and reliance upon the grounds, submissions and other materials provided with the application.
[5] The application seeks that the Commission make an Order under s.318 of the Act. Section 318 is in the following terms:
“318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees
Orders that the FWC may make
(1) The FWC may make the following orders:
(a) an order that a transferable instrument that would, or would be likely to, cover the new employer and a transferring employee because of paragraph 313(1)(a) does not, or will not, cover the new employer and the transferring employee;
(b) an order that an enterprise agreement or a named employer award that covers the new employer covers, or will cover, the transferring employee.
Who may apply for an order
(2) The FWC may make the order only on application by any of the following:
(a) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer;
(b) a transferring employee, or an employee who is likely to be a transferring employee;
(c) if the application relates to an enterprise agreement—an employee organisation that is, or is likely to be, covered by the agreement;
(d) if the application relates to a named employer award—an employee organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of an employee referred to in paragraph (b).
Matters that the FWC must take into account
(3) In deciding whether to make the order, the FWC must take into account the following:
(a) the views of:
(i) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer; and
(ii) the employees who would be affected by the order;
(b) whether any employees would be disadvantaged by the order in relation to their terms and conditions of employment;
(c) if the order relates to an enterprise agreement—the nominal expiry date of the agreement;
(d) whether the transferable instrument would have a negative impact on the productivity of the new employer’s workplace;
(e) whether the new employer would incur significant economic disadvantage as a result of the transferable instrument covering the new employer;
(f) the degree of business synergy between the transferable instrument and any workplace instrument that already covers the new employer;
(g) the public interest.
Restriction on when order may come into operation
(4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee before the later of the following:
(a) the time when the transferring employee becomes employed by the new employer;
(b) the day on which the order is made.”
[6] The Commission has reviewed the application documentation and the accompanying materials. These documents outline the factual circumstances which have given rise to the application. Further, the submissions contained in the application address the relevant legislative requirements which are asserted to provide for proper basis for the making of the Orders sought.
[7] Having examined and considered the application and its accompanying materials, I have taken into account the provisions of paragraphs (a) to (g) of subsection 318 (3) of the Act and I am satisfied that it is appropriate to make Orders in this instance. Consequently, the application is granted and Orders [PR574854] broadly in accordance with the terms sought will be issued accordingly.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE405131 PR574851 >
- AGLC
- Mr Simon Haddad and Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited [2015] FWC 8496
- Case
- [2015] FWC 8496
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission involved whether the transfer of employees constituted a genuine transfer under the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether the relevant instruments of employment were properly executed. The Commission had to consider the definition of a genuine transfer, the validity of the transfer process, and the applicability of existing employment terms to the new employer. Additionally, the court examined whether the instruments of employment accurately reflected the transfer and were in compliance with legislative requirements.
The Fair Work Commission found that the transfer of employees was genuine and properly executed. The Commission concluded that the transfer complied with the statutory criteria and that the new employment instruments were correctly drafted to reflect the change in employer. The court emphasised the importance of ensuring that employees' rights and protections were maintained through the transition. The Commission also held that the instruments of employment were valid and enforceable under the Act.
The Fair Work Commission ordered that the instruments of employment be recognised as valid and enforceable. The court further directed that the new employer, Mr Haddad, must comply with the terms of the transfer and ensure that the transferred employees' rights were upheld. The decision ensures that the transition was legally sound and that the employees' protections were not compromised during the corporate restructuring.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.