Mr K v The Employer

Case [2022] FWC 3351


[2022] FWC 3351

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.394 - Application for unfair dismissal remedy

Mr K

v

The Employer

(U2022/11382; C2022/7901)

COMMISSIONER BISSETT

MELBOURNE, 21 DECEMBER 2022

Application for an unfair dismissal remedy

  1. On 25 November 2022 I dismissed the sixth application made by Mr K (the Applicant)[1] with respect to his employment with The Employer (Respondent). On the same day the Applicant made a further application in which he sought a remedy for his dismissal by the Respondent on 20 December 2020. The Applicant also made an application on 25 November 2022 for the Commission to deal with a dispute pursuant to s.739 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act) in relation to incidents at the time he was employed by the Respondent. The Applicant is no longer employed by the Respondent.

  1. On 8 December 2022 the Applicant sent correspondence to the Commission in which he reiterated his previous submissions that he wished to be heard in relation to his unfair dismissal application.

  1. For the reasons given in the 6 previous decisions issued by Members of the Commission and in the decision in which the Applicant’s appeals were dismissed, this most recent application for unfair dismissal is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1) of the FW Act on the grounds that it has no reasonable prospect of success.

  1. The Applicant has made a number of previous applications for the Commission to deal with a dispute in relation to his employment with the Respondent. For the reasons given in Mr K v The Employer[2] the Applicant does not have standing to make the application and it is therefore dismissed on my own motion pursuant to s.587(1) of the FW Act on the grounds that it has no reasonable prospect of success.

  1. The Applicant has now made 23 applications to the Commission in the space of 2 years in relation to his employment. He also has proceedings in the Federal Court. The Applicant’s persistence will not, without some material change in his circumstances, result in any change in the result of his applications. His dismissal has been subject to proceedings in the Commission and it has been finalised. There will not be any further hearings, as circumstances currently stand, in relation to his dismissal.

  1. For the reasons given in previous decisions I have determined to maintain anonymity of the parties to these applications.

COMMISSIONER


[1] Mr K v The Employer [2022] FWC 3085

[2] Mr K v The Employer[2021] FWC 5610

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR749164>

Details
AGLC
Mr K v The Employer [2022] FWC 3351
Case
[2022] FWC 3351
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission (FWC) was asked to decide on an application for unfair dismissal made by Mr K against The Employer. Mr K, who is no longer employed by The Employer, has made numerous applications to the Commission and has proceedings in the Federal Court. The latest application, his sixth, was dismissed on 25 November 2022, and he subsequently sought to be heard in relation to his unfair dismissal. The Commission, having considered previous decisions and the lack of any material change in circumstances, found that the application had no reasonable prospect of success.

The legal issues the Commission had to address included whether Mr K had standing to make the application, given his history of previous applications and the finality of his dismissal proceedings. The Commission also had to determine whether there was a reasonable prospect of success for Mr K's unfair dismissal application, considering the dismissal had already been subject to proceedings and finalised. The reasoning of the Commission was based on the lack of any new material or change in circumstances that would warrant a different outcome.

The Commission, after reviewing the history of applications and the reasons given in previous decisions, concluded that Mr K did not have standing to make the application and that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The application was dismissed pursuant to section 587(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission maintained the anonymity of the parties as per previous decisions.

The final orders of the Commission were that the application for an unfair dismissal remedy was dismissed, and Mr K did not have standing to make the application under section 739 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission determined that there would be no further hearings in relation to Mr K's dismissal, as circumstances currently stand.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.