Mr Jim Katsis v Origin Energy People Services Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWC 299


[2025] FWC 299

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.365 - Application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal

Mr Jim Katsis
v

Origin Energy People Services Pty Ltd

(C2024/9418)

COMMISSIONER JOHNS

MELBOURNE, 4 FEBRUARY 2025

Application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal - whether the Applicant should be granted permission to be represented

  1. For the reasons explained in transcript on 3 February 2025, the Applicant is granted permission to be represented under s.596 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR783942>

Details
AGLC
Mr Jim Katsis v Origin Energy People Services Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 299
Case
[2025] FWC 299
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Mr Jim Katsis, filed an application with the Fair Work Commission under section 365 of the Fair Work Act 2009, seeking to address alleged contraventions involving his dismissal by Origin Energy People Services Pty Ltd. The dispute centred around the procedural fairness of Mr Katsis' dismissal and his entitlement to representation in the proceedings. The matter was heard and determined by Commissioner Johns in Melbourne on 4 February 2025.

The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether Mr Katsis was entitled to be represented by a legal or other advocate in the proceedings, and if so, whether permission should be granted under section 596 of the Fair Work Act. The Commission had to assess the fairness of the dismissal process and the appropriateness of Mr Katsis being represented in light of the statutory provisions and principles of natural justice.

In delivering the decision, Commissioner Johns noted that the statutory right to be represented under section 596 of the Fair Work Act is not absolute and is subject to the discretion of the Commission. The Commissioner found that Mr Katsis' case had merit and that granting permission for representation would be in the interests of procedural fairness. The decision was based on the complexity of the issues, the potential impact on Mr Katsis' ability to effectively present his case, and the balance of the interests of both parties. Consequently, the Commissioner granted Mr Katsis permission to be represented in the proceedings.

The final orders of the Commission were that Mr Jim Katsis be granted permission to be represented in the application under section 596 of the Fair Work Act 2009. This decision ensures that Mr Katsis has the opportunity to present his case with adequate legal support, facilitating a fair and just resolution of the dispute.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.