Mr David Brownbill v O&M Pty Ltd

Case [2021] FWC 6635


[2021] FWC 6635

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

STATEMENT

Fair Work Act 2009

s.526 – Stand down

Mr David Brownbill

v

O&M Pty Ltd

(C2021/8338)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY

MELBOURNE, 20 December 2021

Alleged stand down dispute – whether employee stood down – concern that COVID-19 vaccination certificate produced appears to have been fraudulently obtained – application discontinued.

  1. On 8 December 2021, Mr Michael Brownbill made an application to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) under s.526 of the Fair Work Act 2009 alleging he had been unlawfully stood down from his employment with O&M Pty Ltd (the Company). I listed the matter for a conference on 20 December 2021.

  1. Mr Brownbill attended the conference via Microsoft teams, together with Mr Ian Green from the Company. In response to Mr Brownbill’s allegation that he had been unlawfully stood down from his employment, the Company raised the question of Mr Brownbill’s COVID-19 vaccination status. Briefly stated, the Company’s position was that Mr Brownbill was a casual employee and had not been stood down. Further, as result of a Direction of the Acting Chief Health Officer of Victoria, the Company said it could not, at the material time, place its employees on a certain client site unless they had proof of vaccination or a first vaccination dose or had a booking to receive a first vaccination dose. The Company asserted that Mr Brownbill had not supplied the requisite proof and therefore it was unable to use his services from 14 October 2021.

  1. During the conference, it was asserted by Mr Brownbill that he had supplied proof of having been vaccinated to the Company on 22 November 2021. The Company held some concerns about the vaccination certificate produced by Mr Brownbill. I requested a copy of the email Mr Brownbill had sent to the Company on 22 November 2021. It was provided.

  1. The email dated 22 November 2021 contained within it the following hyperlink:


type="1">

  • Having clicked on the hyperlink, it appeared to me that the means by which the vaccination certificate had been procured by Mr Brownbill may have been fraudulent and that the certificate he produced may be a fraud.

    1. I expressed this view to the parties.

    1. If the vaccination certificate is a fraud and has been fraudulently obtained via an illegitimate hyperlink on the internet, this would be a matter of extremely serious public policy concern. I invite the relevant public authorities to investigate further.

    1. During a further exchange with Mr Brownbill about a separation certificate he says he was sent to him by the Company, he terminated his involvement in the conference by stating:

    “Fuck this, I’m not wasting any more time with you corrupt idiots.”

    1. From this, I have taken Mr Brownbill to have discontinued his application pursuant to Rule 10(2)(c) of the Fair Work Commission Rules 2013. The Commission’s file will now be closed.


    DEPUTY PRESIDENT

    Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

    <PR736938>

    Details
    AGLC
    Mr David Brownbill v O&M Pty Ltd [2021] FWC 6635
    Case
    [2021] FWC 6635
    Decision Date

    CaseChat Overview and Summary

    In the Fair Work Commission, Mr David Brownbill brought a complaint against O&M Pty Ltd under section 526 of the Fair Work Act 2009, alleging that he had been unlawfully stood down from his employment. The case was heard by Deputy President Clancy in Melbourne on 20 December 2021. The Company, represented by Mr Ian Green, disputed Mr Brownbill's claim, stating that he had not been stood down but rather that it had been unable to utilise his services due to his failure to provide proof of COVID-19 vaccination. This was in accordance with a Direction of the Acting Chief Health Officer of Victoria, which required employees to be vaccinated or have a booking to receive a first vaccination dose to be present on certain client sites.

    The central legal issue was whether Mr Brownbill had been unlawfully stood down from his employment and whether the Company's requirement for proof of vaccination was justified under the circumstances. The Deputy President noted that the Company had concerns about the legitimacy of the vaccination certificate provided by Mr Brownbill, which appeared to have been obtained fraudulently. The Deputy President suggested that the matter warranted further investigation by relevant public authorities due to its serious public policy implications. Ultimately, Mr Brownbill discontinued his application during the conference, leading the Deputy President to close the Commission's file.

    The Fair Work Commission found that Mr Brownbill had discontinued his application and subsequently closed the case file. No orders were made in favour of either party.

    Orders

    Orders of the court

    Full text does not contain this section.

    Background

    Background to the litigation

    Full text does not contain this section.

    Evidence

    Evidence Before The Court

    Full text does not contain this section.

    Decision

    Reasons for decision

    Full text does not contain this section.

    Ratio Decidendi

    Legal Principle Established

    Full text does not contain this section.