Mr Daniel Walker v Airservices Australia

Case [2024] FWC 1058


[2024] FWC 1058

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Mr Daniel Walker
v

Airservices Australia

(B2024/466)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 23 APRIL 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Airservices Australia

  1. This is an application by Daniel Walker (Mr Walker or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Airservices Australia (Airservices or Employer).

  1. I note that Paul Andrew Sutherland has made a separate application for a protected action ballot order in relation the same proposed agreement.[1]

  1. On 22 April 2024, the Respondent advised that it did not object to the application subject to there being an extended notice period of seven (7) working days in relation to the proposed forms of industrial action. This was subsequently agreed by Mr Walker.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Walker, Air Traffic Controller, setting out the steps taken by the Applicant in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with them, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC).

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 6 June 2024.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of seven (7) working days written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR773844.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives for the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] B2024/465.

[2] This is, in effect, 30 working days from the date of the Order, as required by the AEC.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR773845>

Details
AGLC
Mr Daniel Walker v Airservices Australia [2024] FWC 1058
Case
[2024] FWC 1058
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission was asked to decide on an application by Mr Daniel Walker on behalf of some employees of Airservices Australia. They wanted to hold a vote (a ballot) to decide if they should take industrial action, like a strike, because they couldn't agree with their employer on some work-related things. Another person, Mr Paul Andrew Sutherland, also applied for a similar vote but for different reasons related to the same employer. The employer didn't object to the application, but they wanted a longer notice period before any action could start. This was agreed to by Mr Walker.

The court had to decide if the employees could hold a vote to decide on taking industrial action and if the employer's request for a longer notice period was reasonable. The court looked at the law and the information given by Mr Walker, which showed that he had been trying to reach an agreement with the employer. The court was satisfied that all legal requirements were met for holding such a vote and agreed to the longer notice period.

In conclusion, the court allowed the employees to hold a vote to decide on taking industrial action, with the understanding that they must give a longer notice period before starting any action. The vote must be organised by a specific government body and will finish by a certain date. Another person from the Commission will handle further discussions between the employees and the employer to try to reach an agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.