[2013] FWC 5146 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
STATEMENT |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394 - Application for unfair dismissal remedy
Mr Colin Smith
v
Scientific Pest Management (Australia Pacific) Pty Ltd
(U2013/5532)
COMMISSIONER WILSON | MELBOURNE, 30 JULY 2013 |
Application for amended orders - Extension of time to make payment.
[1] Further to the order made by me on 22 July 2013[PR539198], the Respondent Scientific Pest Management (Australia Pacific) Pty Ltd, has approached the Commission for a variation of the time over which the compensation ordered by me must be paid. The order required the compensation to be paid by 5 August 2013.
[2] The Respondent argues that its cash flow is very tight at the moment and that it instead seeks to make payment over 8 weeks from the original date of the order. It says it has paid the first 1/8th payment and indicates it will program the remainder in accordance with this timetable; the next payment would therefore be due on or around 30 July 2013.
[3] The Applicant seeks payment in full in accordance with the original timetable.
[4] After taking into account the views of the parties and the material before me in the hearing, I am disposed to amend the order, but not as significantly as the Respondent proposes. Instead, I will require that all payments be made on or before 23 August 2013.
[5] I will amend the order to the following;
● 23 July 2013 - Payment of 1/8th of total
● 31 July 2013 - Payment of 1/8th of total
● 9 August 2013 - Payment of 1/4th of total
● 16 August 2013 - Payment of 1/4th of total
● 23 August 2013 - Payment of 1/4th of total
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR539507>
- AGLC
- Mr Colin Smith v Scientific Pest Management (Australia Pacific) Pty Ltd [2013] FWC 5146
- Case
- [2013] FWC 5146
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The tribunal considered the circumstances surrounding the delay and the reasons provided by the applicant. It was noted that the applicant had faced financial difficulties, which had impacted his ability to make the payment within the stipulated timeframe. The tribunal also considered the respondent's position and the potential consequences of granting an extension. After weighing the factors, the tribunal found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the delay and that an extension of time would be appropriate.
Accordingly, the tribunal granted an extension of time for the applicant to make the payment, specifying the new due date. The tribunal emphasised the importance of timely payments in contractual relationships and the need for parties to act in good faith. The decision serves as a reminder to all parties involved in contractual agreements to communicate and cooperate to resolve any issues that may arise.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.