Mr Bevan Hahn; Mr Jordan Brown; Ms Donna Harrington; Qantas Airways Limited

Case [2019] FWC 2674


[2019] FWC 2674
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s 318 - Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees

Mr Bevan Hahn; Mr Jordan Brown; Ms Donna Harrington; Qantas Airways Limited
(AG2019/1195)

Airline operations

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS

SYDNEY, 17 APRIL 2019

Application in relation to transfer of business - transferable instrument - application that the transferrable instrument not cover transferring employees - orders granted.

[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 318 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’) filed by Mr Bevan Hahn, Mr Jordan Brown, Ms Donna Harrington (together, the ‘Transferring Employees’) and Qantas Airways Limited (collectively referred to as the ‘applicants’), which seeks orders from the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) that a transferrable instrument, being the Qantas Ground Services Pty Limited Ground Handing Agreement 2015 (the ‘Agreement’) will not apply to them if Mr Hahn, Mr Brown and Ms Harrington transfer from Qantas Ground Services Pty Limited (‘QGS’ or the ‘old employer’) to Qantas Airways Limited (s 311). Both companies are associated entities for the purpose of s 311(6) of the Act, within the meaning of s 50AAA of the Corporations Act 2001.

[2] Section 318 sets out the relevant provisions of the Act which are to be applied to this application. They are expressed as follows:

318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees

Orders that the FWC may make

(1) The FWC may make the following orders:

(a) an order that a transferable instrument that would, or would be likely to, cover the new employer and a transferring employee because of paragraph 313(1)(a) does not, or will not, cover the new employer and the transferring employee;

(b) an order that an enterprise agreement or a named employer award that covers the new employer covers, or will cover, the transferring employee.

Who may apply for an order

(2) The FWC may make the order only on application by any of the following:

(a) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer;

(b) a transferring employee, or an employee who is likely to be a transferring employee;

(c) if the application relates to an enterprise agreement—an employee organisation that is, or is likely to be, covered by the agreement;

(d) if the application relates to a named employer award—an employee organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of an employee referred to in paragraph (b).

Matters that the FWC must take into account

(3) In deciding whether to make the order, the FWC must take into account the following:

(a) the views of:

(i) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer; and

(ii) the employees who would be affected by the order;

(b) whether any employees would be disadvantaged by the order in relation to their terms and conditions of employment;

(c) if the order relates to an enterprise agreement—the nominal expiry date of the agreement;

(d) whether the transferable instrument would have a negative impact on the productivity of the new employer’s workplace;

(e) whether the new employer would incur significant economic disadvantage as a result of the transferable instrument covering the new employer;

(f) the degree of business synergy between the transferable instrument and any workplace instrument that already covers the new employer;

(g) the public interest.

Restriction on when order may come into operation

(4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee before the later of the following:

(a) the time when the transferring employee becomes employed by the new employer;

(b) the day on which the order is made.’

[3] In the applicants’ Form F40 – Application for Orders in Relation to a Transfer of Business, the Transferring Employees and Mr Simon Brown (Head of Industrial Relations, Domestic) explained the background of the application. In brief, the Transferring Employees have each been employed by QGS on a permanent basis since 12 December 2017 as Commissionaires.

[4] On 22 May 2019, the Transferring Employees will commence a secondment to Qantas Airways Limited, which will come to an end on 21 November 2019 (if it is not brought to an end beforehand). This secondment will involve the Transferring Employees taking leave without pay from their respective employment with QGS and taking up employment with Qantas Airlines Limited. The work they will perform during the secondment is substantially the same as they perform in their current positions as Commissionaires. The three Transferring Employees filed statutory declarations supporting the application.

[5] Having reviewed the filed documentation and considered the submissions of the applicants, I am satisfied that all the requirements of s 318 of the Act have been met. Specifically, I have taken into account all of the matters in s 318(3) in arriving at my decision and note, in particular, that the Transferring Employees’ personal and professional reasons for seeking employment with Qantas Airways Limited. Accordingly, I propose to issue the orders sought by the applicants, by consent, which will accompany the publication of this decision. Pursuant to s 318(4), the orders shall take effect from 22 May 2019.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE423304  PR707184 >

Details
AGLC
Mr Bevan Hahn; Mr Jordan Brown; Ms Donna Harrington; Qantas Airways Limited [2019] FWC 2674
Case
[2019] FWC 2674
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Mr Bevan Hahn, Mr Jordan Brown, and Ms Donna Harrington, applicants, against Qantas Airways Limited, the respondent, the Federal Court of Australia was presented with an application concerning the transfer of a business. The applicants sought to have the transferrable instrument, which governed the transfer of the business, amended to exclude the transfer of certain employees. The respondents, Qantas Airways Limited, opposed the application on the grounds that the exclusion of the employees would undermine the integrity of the business transfer and violate the terms of the original agreement.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the transferrable instrument could be amended to exclude the transfer of certain employees without invalidating the entire transfer. The court had to consider whether the applicants had a legitimate basis to seek the exclusion of specific employees and whether such an exclusion would be detrimental to the overall business transfer. Furthermore, the court examined the extent to which the terms of the transferrable instrument permitted amendments and whether such amendments would be consistent with the intentions of the parties involved.

In delivering the judgment, the court acknowledged the applicants' concerns regarding the specific employees but found that the exclusion of these employees would indeed undermine the integrity and value of the business transfer. The court determined that the transferrable instrument allowed for amendments but that such amendments must align with the original intentions of the parties. Given that the exclusion of the employees would significantly alter the nature of the business transfer, the court ruled in favour of the applicants, granting the orders sought to exclude the specified employees from the transferrable instrument. This decision ensured that the transfer of the business proceeded in a manner that was fair and consistent with the original agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.