| [2017] FWCA 4201 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| decision |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Mount Hotham Alpine Resort Management Board
(AG2017/2311)
Mount Hotham Alpine Resort Management Board 2016 Enterprise Agreement
| State and Territory government administration | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT KOVACIC | CANBERRA, 15 AUGUST 2017 |
Application for approval of the Mount Hotham Alpine Resort Management Board 2016 Enterprise Agreement – agreement approved with undertakings.
An application was received by the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) on 19 June 2017 for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Mount Hotham Alpine Resort Management Board 2016 Enterprise Agreement (the Agreement). The application was made by the Mount Hotham Alpine Resort Management Board (the Applicant) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
On 1 August 2017 the Commission wrote to the Applicant raising a number of issues regarding the Agreement and in light of these concerns foreshadowed that the application would be listed for a hearing.
The matter was heard on 10 August 2017 with prior to that hearing the Applicant foreshadowing that undertakings would be provided to the Commission in respect of some of the issues raised by the Commission.
The material provided by the Applicant and the Australian Workers Union (AWU), a bargaining representative for the Agreement, both prior to and at the hearing addressed the Commission’s issues. The hearing concluded on the basis that the Applicant would provide signed undertakings to the Commission. The AWU expressed no issues with the proposed undertakings.
Those undertakings were received by the Commission on 15 August 2017.
Subject to concerns that have been addressed by way of undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
Pursuant to s.190(3), I have accepted the undertakings from the Applicant. In accordance with s.191(1) of the Act the undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertaking is attached to this decision.
Further, the flexibility term contained in clause 2.14.1 of the Agreement does not comply with the requirements of s.203 of the Act in that it does not require the employer to ensure that a copy of any individual flexibility agreement that has been agreed to, be given to the employee within 14 days. Therefore, in accordance with s.202(4) of the Act the model flexibility term set out in Schedule 2.2 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
The AWU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 22 August 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 September 2019.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE425137, PR595301 >
- AGLC
- Mount Hotham Alpine Resort Management Board [2017] FWCA 4201
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 4201
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the terms of the Enterprise Agreement were fair and reasonable, and whether they complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act. The Commission needed to consider whether the agreement met the "better off overall test," which required that employees be no worse off financially and at least as well off in other respects compared to their previous conditions of employment. Additionally, the Commission had to ensure that the agreement did not contravene any provisions of the Fair Work Act or any relevant industrial instruments.
After reviewing the submissions and evidence provided by both the management board and the employees' representatives, the Fair Work Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement with certain undertakings. These undertakings were aimed at ensuring compliance with specific provisions of the Fair Work Act, including those related to the calculation and payment of wages, the provision of leave, and the protection of employees' rights. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement met the better off overall test and was fair and reasonable for the employees.
The Commission's final orders included the approval of the Mount Hotham Alpine Resort Management Board 2016 Enterprise Agreement, subject to the specified undertakings. These undertakings required the management board to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act and the terms of the approved agreement, and to provide regular reports to the Commission to demonstrate compliance. The agreement was to take effect from the date of the Commission's decision, and the parties were directed to implement the terms of the agreement in accordance with the approved undertakings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.