[2013] FWCA 8015 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Mount Barker Waldorf School
(AG2013/9620)
MOUNT BARKER WALDORF SCHOOL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Educational services | |
COMMISSIONER STEEL | ADELAIDE, 14 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Mount Barker Waldorf School Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Mount Barker Waldorf School Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss. 186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Independent Education Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover them. As required by s.201 (2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers that organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54 (1) of the Act it will operate from 21 October 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 14 October 2014.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE404746 PR543200>
- AGLC
- Mount Barker Waldorf School [2013] FWCA 8015
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 8015
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court encompassed whether the agreement was genuinely bargained, provided adequate terms and conditions for the employees, and aligned with the principles of procedural fairness and substantive fairness. Additionally, the court had to assess if the agreement fulfilled the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. The court's analysis involved a thorough examination of the negotiation process, the content of the agreement, and its impact on the employees' working conditions.
Upon reviewing the evidence, the court determined that the negotiation process was fair and that the agreement was genuinely reached without any undue influence. The terms of the agreement were found to be reasonable, providing adequate protection for the employees while also accommodating the operational needs of the school. The court concluded that the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval and was fair and reasonable in all respects. The court endorsed the agreement, paving the way for its implementation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.