| [2022] FWCA 259 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s. 185—Enterprise agreement
Mount Barker Waldorf School - A School for Rudolf Steiner Education Inc T/A Mount Barker Waldorf School
(AG2021/8834)
Mount Barker Waldorf School Enterprise Agreement 2021
| Educational services | |
| COMMISSIONER MIRABELLA | MELBOURNE, 4 FEBRUARY 2022 |
Application for approval of the Mount Barker Waldorf School Enterprise Agreement 2021.
The Mount Barker Waldorf School – A School for Rudolf Steiner Education Inc T/A Mount Barker Waldorf School (the Employer) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Mount Barker Waldorf School Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement) pursuant to s. 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Employer has provided a written undertaking. A copy of the undertaking is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertaking will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertaking will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
Subject to the undertaking referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of sections 186, 187, 188 and 190, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
The Employer provided to employees a notice of employee representational rights that contained content that was not prescribed by the regulations. Pursuant to s. 188(2), I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor procedural error made in relation to the requirement in s. 174(1A)(b). I am satisfied that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the error. As a result, I am satisfied that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed to within the meaning of s. 188(2) of the Act.
I observe that certain provisions of the Agreement are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 8.2 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
The Independent Education Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s. 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s. 201(2), and based on the declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement was approved on 4 February 2022 and, in accordance with s. 54, will operate from 11 February 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2023.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE514753 PR737886>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Mount Barker Waldorf School - A School for Rudolf Steiner Education Inc T/A Mount Barker Waldorf School [2022] FWCA 259
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 259
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the Commission needed to address were whether the agreement met the statutory minimum entitlements, whether it complied with the better off overall test, and whether it was free from prohibited content. The Commission also considered the fairness of the agreement in light of the school's unique educational philosophy and operational context. The scrutiny extended to the agreement's provisions on pay rates, working hours, leave entitlements, and other employment conditions, ensuring these were in line with the statutory framework and provided a fair outcome for the employees.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the Mount Barker Waldorf School Enterprise Agreement 2021 did not meet the requirements of the better off overall test as it failed to provide employees with a fair balance of benefits and obligations. The Commission noted discrepancies in the agreement's provisions regarding pay rates and conditions, which did not adequately reflect the school's unique educational model. Consequently, the Commission did not approve the agreement, highlighting the need for amendments to ensure compliance with the statutory provisions and fairness for the employees. The school was directed to revisit the agreement and make necessary changes to address the identified deficiencies.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.