Mott v Crest Cabinets

In the case of Mott v Crest Cabinets, the plaintiff sought damages for injuries sustained in a workplace accident. The accident occurred when the plaintiff, an employee of Crest Cabinets, suffered a significant injury to his dominant wrist and subsequent neurological damage. The plaintiff sued for damages, including loss of earnings, loss of earning capacity, and non-pecuniary damages such as pain and suffering. The court was required to determine the appropriate measure of damages, considering both the physical and psychiatric injuries suffered by the plaintiff, as well as the cumulative effect of these injuries. The court also needed to address whether an appointment order was necessary to manage the plaintiff's affairs.

The court found that the measure of damages should reflect the full extent of the plaintiff's injuries and their impact on his life. It considered not only the loss of earnings and earning capacity but also the non-pecuniary damages associated with the physical and psychiatric injuries. The court concluded that the plaintiff's injuries had a profound effect on his quality of life, and therefore, the damages awarded needed to comprehensively address both the physical and psychological impacts. Additionally, the court found that an appointment order was not necessary at that time, as the plaintiff's injuries did not impair his ability to manage his own affairs.

As a result, the court awarded the plaintiff damages for his loss of earnings, diminished earning capacity, and non-pecuniary damages. The court found that the cumulative effect of the injuries justified a significant award, reflecting the profound impact on the plaintiff's life. The court also noted that the damages should be structured to provide ongoing support for the plaintiff's needs, considering the long-term nature of his injuries.

The court ordered that judgment be entered in favour of the plaintiff and that damages be assessed and paid accordingly.