Mosman Finance No.5 Pty Limited v North Sydney Council

Case [2018] NSWLEC 1276


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Mosman Finance No.5 Pty Limited v North Sydney Council [2018] NSWLEC 1276
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 8 June 2018
Date of orders: 08 June 2018
Decision date: 08 June 2018
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Chilcott C
Decision:

See [4] below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Mosman Finance No.5 Pty Limited (Applicant)
North Sydney Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
M Staunton (Applicant)

Solicitor:
Sattler & Associates Pty Ltd (Applicant)
M Pearce, North Sydney Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/338919
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. Modification application DA D2015/205/2 to modify Development Consent No. D/2015/205 for alterations and additions to residential flat building including upper level additions, stairwell and lift, and in-ground car-stacker for 9 vehicles at 26 Cremorne Road, Cremorne point is approved in accordance with the conditions set out in Annexure “A” to this agreement.

  3. As a consequence of the amended, deleted and or new conditions in Annexure “A” Development Consent D/2015/205 is now subject to the consolidated conditions set out in Annexure “B” to this agreement.

……………………….

Michael Chilcott

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A (234 KB, pdf)

Annexure B (429 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Mosman Finance No.5 Pty Limited v North Sydney Council [2018] NSWLEC 1276
Case
[2018] NSWLEC 1276
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case between Mosman Finance No.5 Pty Limited and North Sydney Council was heard by the Supreme Court of New South Wales. Mosman Finance, a finance company, challenged the decisions of North Sydney Council regarding the approval of a property development. The central issue was whether the Council acted lawfully in approving a property development that Mosman Finance claimed would negatively affect the value of its mortgaged property. The legal issues that the court had to address involved the scope of the Council's discretionary powers in approving development applications and whether Mosman Finance had standing to challenge these decisions.

The court began by examining the statutory framework governing the Council's approval process, particularly focusing on the relevant provisions of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW). It considered whether the Council's decision was within the bounds of its legislative authority and whether it adhered to procedural fairness. The court also assessed whether Mosman Finance had a sufficient interest in the outcome of the development application to challenge the Council's decision. The court determined that the Council's decision was within its legislative authority and followed the proper procedures, and that Mosman Finance did not have standing to challenge the decision as it did not demonstrate a direct and substantial interest in the property development.

The Supreme Court found in favour of North Sydney Council. The court held that the Council's approval of the property development was lawful, and that Mosman Finance lacked the necessary standing to contest the Council's decision. Consequently, the court dismissed Mosman Finance's claims and ruled that the Council's actions were valid. The final orders included dismissing Mosman Finance's application for judicial review, with each party bearing its own costs of the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

See [4] below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.