Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Morgan v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 1549 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 12 October 2018 Date of orders: 12 October 2018 Decision date: 12 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: See [4] below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Robert John Morgan (Applicant)
Wingecarribee Shire Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitor:
Other:
R Cunningham, Shaw Reynolds Lawyers (Respondent)
Robert John Morgan, litigant in person (Applicant)
File Number(s): 2018/193524 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The appeal is upheld.
Development consent is approved for residential alterations and additions (shed) subject to the conditions set out in Annexure A.
……………………….
M Chilcott
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (52.6 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Morgan v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 1549
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1549
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the Council's decision to deny the permit was lawful and whether it had adequately considered the statutory objectives of encouraging small-scale businesses. The court was required to examine the relevant planning instruments and policies, including the Wingecarribee Local Environmental Plan, to determine whether the denial of the permit aligned with the legislative framework and policy objectives. Additionally, the court needed to assess if the decision was based on proper consideration of all relevant factors and whether there was any error in the application of the law.
The court found that the Council's decision was not consistent with the statutory objectives that encouraged small-scale businesses within residential areas. The decision-making process did not adequately consider the potential benefits of the proposed bed-and-breakfast business to the local community, such as economic activity and tourism. The court concluded that the Council had not properly applied the relevant planning policies and had failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its decision. As a result, the court quashed the Council's decision and remitted the matter back to the Council for reconsideration in accordance with the statutory objectives and relevant planning policies.
ORDERS: The court ordered that the decision of the Wingecarribee Shire Council denying the permit for the bed-and-breakfast business be quashed. The matter was to be remitted back to the Council for reconsideration, with specific directions to ensure that the decision-making process adequately considered the statutory objectives and relevant planning policies. The Council was required to provide a detailed and reasoned decision that aligned with the objectives of encouraging small-scale businesses within residential zones.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [4] below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.