More v G and T Security PY Ltd
Case
•
[2015] FCCA 2796
•25 September 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
More v G and T Security PY Ltd [2015] FCCA 2796
[2015] FCCA 2796
25 September 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
More, an employee, brought proceedings against G and T Security Pty Ltd (the employer) in the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission seeking unpaid wages. The dispute concerned the correct entitlements owed to More under the *Security Services Industry Award 2010* for work performed.
The primary legal issue before the Commission was to determine the quantum of unpaid wages due to More, specifically whether the employer had correctly calculated and paid all entitlements in accordance with the applicable award provisions. This involved an examination of the hours worked, penalty rates, and any other applicable allowances.
Judge Vasta found that the employer had failed to pay More the full entitlements owed under the *Security Services Industry Award 2010*. The Commission applied the terms of the award to the factual matrix of hours worked and conditions of employment. Consequently, the employer was ordered to pay the outstanding wages to More.
The primary legal issue before the Commission was to determine the quantum of unpaid wages due to More, specifically whether the employer had correctly calculated and paid all entitlements in accordance with the applicable award provisions. This involved an examination of the hours worked, penalty rates, and any other applicable allowances.
Judge Vasta found that the employer had failed to pay More the full entitlements owed under the *Security Services Industry Award 2010*. The Commission applied the terms of the award to the factual matrix of hours worked and conditions of employment. Consequently, the employer was ordered to pay the outstanding wages to More.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Breach
-
Remedies
-
Jurisdiction
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
2