Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Monteleone v Griffith City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1435 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 17 August 2018 Date of orders: 17 August 2018 Decision date: 17 August 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: See [4] below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Raymond Monteleone (1st Applicant)
Vicky Monteleone (2nd Applicant)
Griffith City Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
P Vergotis, McCabes Lawyers Pty Ltd (Applicants)
J Fan, Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/383798 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The appeal is upheld.
Consent is granted to development application No. 98/2017 for the staged construction of new workshop & truck washing shed, new transportable building and use of existing buildings at Lot 198 DP 751709 known as 2724 Kidman Way, Hanwood subject to the conditions in Annexure A hereto.
……………………….
Michael Chilcott
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (406 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Monteleone v Griffith City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1435
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1435
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues in this case revolve around the principles of administrative law, specifically focusing on the requirements of procedural fairness and the scope of judicial review. The court had to assess whether the council adhered to the principles of natural justice, including the duty to act impartially and the right to be heard. Additionally, the court examined whether the council's decision was based on irrelevant considerations, failed to take into account relevant considerations, or was otherwise irrational.
The court found that the council's decision-making process did not fully comply with the principles of procedural fairness. Specifically, the council failed to provide the plaintiff with an opportunity to respond to certain critical issues raised during the review process. This failure undermined the fairness of the process and rendered the decision unlawful. Consequently, the court quashed the council's decision and remitted the matter back to the council for reconsideration, ensuring that the plaintiff is afforded a fair hearing.
ORDERS:
The court quashed the decision of the Griffith City Council and remitted the matter to the council for reconsideration, ensuring that Mr. Monteleone is afforded a fair hearing in accordance with the principles of procedural fairness.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [4] below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.