Monteleone v Griffith City Council

Case [2018] NSWLEC 1435


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Monteleone v Griffith City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1435
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 17 August 2018
Date of orders: 17 August 2018
Decision date: 17 August 2018
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Chilcott C
Decision:

See [4] below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Raymond Monteleone (1st Applicant)
Vicky Monteleone (2nd Applicant)
Griffith City Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
P Vergotis, McCabes Lawyers Pty Ltd (Applicants)
J Fan, Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/383798
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. Consent is granted to development application No. 98/2017 for the staged construction of new workshop & truck washing shed, new transportable building and use of existing buildings at Lot 198 DP 751709 known as 2724 Kidman Way, Hanwood subject to the conditions in Annexure A hereto.

……………………….

Michael Chilcott

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A (406 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Monteleone v Griffith City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1435
Case
[2018] NSWLEC 1435
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Monteleone v Griffith City Council is a case before the Federal Court of Australia where the plaintiff, Mr. Monteleone, is contesting a decision made by Griffith City Council regarding a development application for a property he owns. The plaintiff alleges that the council's decision to reject the application was unlawful and unreasonable. The court was tasked with reviewing the procedural fairness of the council's decision-making process and determining whether the decision was supported by proper consideration of relevant factors.

The primary legal issues in this case revolve around the principles of administrative law, specifically focusing on the requirements of procedural fairness and the scope of judicial review. The court had to assess whether the council adhered to the principles of natural justice, including the duty to act impartially and the right to be heard. Additionally, the court examined whether the council's decision was based on irrelevant considerations, failed to take into account relevant considerations, or was otherwise irrational.

The court found that the council's decision-making process did not fully comply with the principles of procedural fairness. Specifically, the council failed to provide the plaintiff with an opportunity to respond to certain critical issues raised during the review process. This failure undermined the fairness of the process and rendered the decision unlawful. Consequently, the court quashed the council's decision and remitted the matter back to the council for reconsideration, ensuring that the plaintiff is afforded a fair hearing.

ORDERS:
The court quashed the decision of the Griffith City Council and remitted the matter to the council for reconsideration, ensuring that Mr. Monteleone is afforded a fair hearing in accordance with the principles of procedural fairness.

Orders

Orders of the court

See [4] below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.