Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Monovasios v Mid-Coast Council [2016] NSWLEC 1283 Hearing dates: 6, 7, 8 June 2016; conditions 1 July 2016 Date of orders: 08 July 2016 Decision date: 08 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Pearson C Decision: 1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. Development Application DA269/2015 for a three storey motel comprising five motel units and a manager’s suite, with parking for six vehicles, at 10 Myall Street Pindimar, is refused.
3. The exhibits are returned except for exhibits 1, 20, A, B, G, J and N.Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: Motel – Bushfire prone land – Asset Protection Zone –Vegetation clearing – Endangered Ecological Communities – Suitability of the site Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Fisheries Management Act 1994
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Native Vegetation Act 2003
Roads Act 1993
Rural Fires Act 1997
Threatened Species Conservation Act 2005
Rural Fires Regulation 2013
State Environmental Planning Policy No 71 – Coastal Protection
Great Lakes Local Environmental Plan 2014Cases Cited: BGP Properties Pty Limited v Lake Macquarie City Council [2004] NSWLEC 399
Davis v Gosford City Council [2014] NSWCA 343
De Angelis v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2016] NSWLEC 1
Futurespace Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2009] NSWLEC 153
Scott Revay & Unn v Ku-ring-gai Council [1994] NSWLEC 112Texts Cited: Planning for Bush Fire Protection (2006) NSW Rural Fire Service Category: Principal judgment Parties: Fotios Monovasios (Applicant)
Mid-Coast Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr M Staunton (Applicant)
Ms H Irish (Respondent)
Mr T Flaherty, Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Applicant)
Mr T Pickup, Local Government Legal (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/162981 (formerly 11113 of 2015) Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
This is an appeal under s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the Act) against the refusal by Great Lakes Shire Council (now Mid-Coast Council) of consent to Development Application DA269/2015 for a three storey motel comprising five motel units and a manager’s suite, with parking for six vehicles, at 10 Myall Street Pindimar (the site).
-
The site is located on the southern side of Myall Street, with a frontage of 20.115m and a side boundary of 72.42m, and with frontage on the southern boundary to Pindimar Bay, which is part of Port Stephens. The site has an area of 1,454sqm. There is an existing open shed and caravan on the site.
-
There are four separate vegetation community types occupying four bands across the site. From north to south, those communities are Flooded Gum Modified Tall Woodland (River Flat Eucalypt Forest on Coastal Floodplains) (RFEF), an area of approximately 30m in width from the front boundary; Mangrove Woodland, a band width of approximately 20m; Swamp Oak Floodplain Forest, a band width of approximately 15m; and Estuarine Mudflats/Mangrove Woodland, which is part of the body of the Port Stephens Estuary and is generally inundated by mean high water. The River-flat Eucalypt Forest on Coastal Floodplains and the Swamp Oak Floodplain Forest are listed as endangered ecological communities…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Monovasios v Mid-Coast Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1283
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the council had not erred in its decision to refuse the development application. The court held that the proposal did not comply with several relevant planning provisions and policies, including the need to protect and enhance the character of Pindimar, and the need to ensure compatibility with surrounding land uses. The court found that the proposal would have a significant impact on the character of the area and would be incompatible with surrounding land uses. The court also found that the council had properly considered relevant planning provisions and policies in reaching its decision. The appeal was dismissed, and the development application was refused. The exhibits were returned except for exhibits 1, 20, A, B, G, J and N.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. Development Application DA269/2015 for a three storey motel comprising five motel units and a manager’s suite, with parking for six vehicles, at 10 Myall Street Pindimar, is refused.
3. The exhibits are returned except for exhibits 1, 20, A, B, G, J and N.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.