Monahan and Monahan

In the matter of *Monahan and Monahan*, heard before McClelland J, the wife had filed an Application in a Case on 29 June 2016 seeking various orders. The specific nature of the dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided text, but it is clear that the wife sought a range of relief from the court.

The court was required to determine the disposition of several of the wife's requested orders. Specifically, the court considered orders numbered 2 and 4, as well as orders 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 of the wife's application. The court also had to consider the matter of costs.

McClelland J ordered that orders 2 and 4 of the wife's application be dismissed. The remaining aspects of the application, namely orders 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, were stood over to a future listing on 10 October 2016. Regarding order 10, the court directed each party to serve on the other a Notice requiring disclosure of documents pursuant to rule 13.08 of the *Family Law Rules 2004* (Cth). The costs of the hearing on that day were reserved.