Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd

Case [2013] FWCA 1625


[2013] FWCA 1625

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd
(AG2013/108)

MONADELPHOUS ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES PTY LTD WORSLEY ALUMINA OPERATIONS AMWU AGREEMENT 2012

Building, metal and civil construction industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY

PERTH, 15 MARCH 2013

Application for approval of the Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd Worsley Alumina Operations AMWU Agreement 2012.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd Worsley Alumina Operations AMWU Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is two years from the date of operation.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE400301  PR534864>

Details
AGLC
Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 1625
Case
[2013] FWCA 1625
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd, the Fair Work Commission was asked to approve a registered agreement between the company and the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union. The dispute arose from negotiations over employment terms and conditions for workers at the Worsley Alumina Operations. The Commission was tasked with ensuring that the agreement met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement complied with the procedural and substantive fairness requirements of the Act. Specifically, the Commission had to determine if the agreement had been made in good faith, and if it contained terms that were fair and reasonable, having regard to the circumstances of the employees and the operations of the business. Additionally, the Commission had to consider if the agreement met the criteria for being a "single interest" employer agreement.

The Commission found that the agreement had been made in good faith and was fair and reasonable. It noted that the agreement contained terms that were beneficial to the employees and that the negotiation process had been conducted in a manner that was procedurally fair. The Commission also concluded that the agreement met the criteria for being a "single interest" employer agreement, as it related to a single enterprise and a single employer. Based on these findings, the Commission approved the agreement.

In approving the agreement, the Commission made orders to register the Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd Worsley Alumina Operations AMWU Agreement 2012, effective from the date of the decision. The agreement was to remain in force until it was terminated or varied in accordance with its terms, or until superseded by a new agreement. The decision provided clarity for both the employer and the union regarding the terms of the agreement and ensured that the employees' rights were protected under the new agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.