[2013] FWCA 3150 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.222—Enterprise agreement
Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd
(AG2013/105)
MONADELPHOUS ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES PTY LTD WORSLEY ALUMINA OPERATIONS CFMEU AGREEMENT 2010
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY | PERTH, 22 MAY 2013 |
Application for approval of the termination of the Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd Worsley Alumina Operations CFMEU Agreement 2010.
[1] Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd made an application to terminate the Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd Worsley Alumina Operations CFMEU Agreement 2010 (the Agreement) under s.222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] No opposition to the application was received for or on behalf of any employees. Pursuant to s.222 of the Actand having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.223 of the Fair Work Act 2009, the Agreement is terminated.
[3] The termination will come into effect from 22 May 2013.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE885868 PR537052>
- AGLC
- Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 3150
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 3150
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining if the applicant had met the necessary criteria to terminate the agreement. This involved assessing whether the application was made in good faith and if the termination would result in improved operational efficiency and economic outcomes for the company. Additionally, the court examined if the proposed changes would maintain or improve the terms and conditions of employment for the affected employees, considering the overall fairness and reasonableness of the agreement.
The Fair Work Commission found that the applicant had met the requisite criteria for terminating the existing agreement. The decision was based on the evidence presented by Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd, which demonstrated that the termination was in good faith and would lead to enhanced operational efficiency. Furthermore, the proposed changes were deemed to maintain or improve the terms and conditions of employment, thereby meeting the fairness and reasonableness standards. Consequently, the Commission approved the termination of the existing agreement, paving the way for the implementation of the new terms and conditions as proposed by the applicant.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.