Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd

Case [2013] FWCA 6981


[2013] FWCA 6981

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd
(AG2013/2786)

MONADELPHOUS ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES PTY LTD GOLDFIELDS EMPLOYEE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2013

Manufacturing and associated industries

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON

MELBOURNE, 16 SEPTEMBER 2013

Application for approval of the Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd Goldfields Employee Collective Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd Goldfields Employee Collective Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 23 September 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 15 September 2017.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code C, AE404044  PR541795>

Details
AGLC
Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 6981
Case
[2013] FWCA 6981
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, the applicant Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd sought approval for the Goldfields Employee Collective Agreement 2013. The dispute revolved around whether the agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. The nature of the disagreement was primarily concerned with the provisions related to employee leave entitlements and the procedural fairness in the negotiation process.

The key legal issues the Commission had to address were whether the collective agreement met the necessary standards under the Fair Work Act and whether the agreement had been made in accordance with the relevant procedures. Specifically, the applicant sought to confirm that the leave provisions did not contravene any minimum entitlements and that the negotiation process was fair and transparent. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement adequately protected the rights of employees and complied with any relevant award or enterprise agreement provisions.

In its decision, the Commission examined the negotiation process and the content of the agreement. It found that the agreement was made in good faith and that the negotiation process was fair. The Commission also concluded that the leave provisions in the agreement did not contravene the minimum entitlements under the Fair Work Act and were in line with the broader regulatory framework. Based on these findings, the Commission approved the collective agreement, confirming that it met the necessary legal standards and provided adequate protections for employees.

The Commission's final order was the approval of the Goldfields Employee Collective Agreement 2013, subject to the terms and conditions specified in the decision. The approval was contingent upon the continued compliance with the Fair Work Act and any other relevant legislation and regulatory requirements.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.