MOLKENS & ANSELL

Case

[2020] FCCA 37

14 January 2020


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Molkens and Ansell [2020] FCCA 37 [2020] FCCA 37 14 January 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of MOLKENS & ANSELL, heard before Judge Lapthorn, the dispute concerned parenting arrangements for four children following the parents' separation. The proceedings addressed allegations of parental alienation and the separation of siblings, with a particular focus on the time spent between one child and a parent.

The court was required to determine the appropriate parental responsibility for the long-term care, welfare, and development of each child, as well as establish specific living arrangements and time spent between the children and each parent. Key issues included how to address the alleged alienation, the separation of siblings, and the need for therapeutic intervention for one of the children. The court also considered provisions for communication between parents, sharing of information, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

Judge Lapthorn ordered the discharge of all previous parenting orders. The father was granted sole parental responsibility for the eldest child, Z, with specific requirements for consultation with the mother on long-term decisions. The mother was granted sole parental responsibility for the remaining three children, W, Y, and X, also with similar consultation requirements. The court made detailed orders regarding the children's living arrangements, including a temporary period where W, Y, and X would not spend time with the father, followed by a structured schedule of time spent with each parent. Therapeutic counselling was ordered for Z, with shared costs and specific directions for its implementation. The orders also included provisions for school holidays, special occasions, communication, travel, and dispute resolution.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

Legal Concepts

  • Jurisdiction

  • Remedies

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Costs

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

2

Statutory Material Cited

3

Godfrey & Sanders [2007] FamCA 102
MRR v GR [2010] HCA 4