Modern Awards Review 2012 - Public Holidays
Case
•
[2013] FWCFB 2168
•12 APRIL 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Modern Awards Review 2012 - Public Holidays [2013] FWCFB 2168
[2013] FWCFB 2168
12 APRIL 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case, Modern Awards Review 2012 - Public Holidays, involved a review of public holiday provisions in various awards under the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009. The parties were representatives of employers and employees who had differing views on the amendments to the public holiday provisions. The dispute was heard by the Fair Work Commission. The legal issues before the court included whether the proposed changes to public holiday provisions were justified and whether the proposed changes provided sufficient flexibility.
The Fair Work Commission found that there was not sufficient evidence to support the substantive claims made by the parties. The Commission recognised that there was some merit in the proposals to provide additional flexibility in the public holiday provisions. However, the Commission was not persuaded that the changes proposed were necessary. The Commission remitted the matter to individual members for further consideration. The Commission found that the proposed changes to the public holiday provisions would not achieve the desired outcome and would cause confusion and inconsistency in the awards.
The outcome of the case was that the proposed changes to the public holiday provisions were not accepted. The Commission found that the current provisions were sufficient and that there was no need for further changes. The case was remitted to individual members for further consideration of the proposals. The final orders of the Commission were that the proposed changes to the public holiday provisions were not accepted, and the matter was remitted to individual members for further consideration. The current public holiday provisions would remain in place until further amendments were made.
The Fair Work Commission found that there was not sufficient evidence to support the substantive claims made by the parties. The Commission recognised that there was some merit in the proposals to provide additional flexibility in the public holiday provisions. However, the Commission was not persuaded that the changes proposed were necessary. The Commission remitted the matter to individual members for further consideration. The Commission found that the proposed changes to the public holiday provisions would not achieve the desired outcome and would cause confusion and inconsistency in the awards.
The outcome of the case was that the proposed changes to the public holiday provisions were not accepted. The Commission found that the current provisions were sufficient and that there was no need for further changes. The case was remitted to individual members for further consideration of the proposals. The final orders of the Commission were that the proposed changes to the public holiday provisions were not accepted, and the matter was remitted to individual members for further consideration. The current public holiday provisions would remain in place until further amendments were made.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Statutory Interpretation
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
4 yearly review of modern awards – Public Holidays [2019] FWCFB 1369
Cases Citing This Decision
38
4 yearly review of modern awards – Public Holidays
[2019] FWCFB 1369
4 yearly review of modern awards – Public Holidays
[2018] FWCFB 4
4 yearly review of modern awards – Penalty Rates
[2017] FWCFB 1001
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
0
Modern Awards Review 2012—Penalty Rates
[2013] FWCFB 1635
Modern Awards Review 2012—Penalty Rates
[2013] FWCFB 1635