Moby & Schulter
Case
•
[2009] FamCA 1285
•23 December 2009
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Moby & Schulter [2009] FamCA 1285
[2009] FamCA 1285
23 December 2009
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Moby & Schulter*, heard before Cronin J, the applicant and respondent sought declarations regarding the existence and termination of a de facto relationship for the purposes of property settlement under the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). The core of the dispute concerned whether the parties had been in a de facto relationship and, if so, when that relationship had ended.
The court was required to determine two primary legal issues. Firstly, whether the parties met the criteria for a de facto relationship as defined by the *Family Law Act 1975*. Secondly, if a de facto relationship was found to exist, the court needed to ascertain the date on which that relationship concluded.
Cronin J declared that, pursuant to s 90RD of the *Family Law Act 1975*, the applicant and respondent were in a de facto relationship for the purposes of an order under s 90SG. Furthermore, the court found that the parties' relationship ended in November 2009, satisfying the requirements of s 90RD(2)(d) and s 90SG. The court also made orders for the adjournment of outstanding interim applications, directed the respondent to pay a sum of $3000 to the applicant, and set a deadline for the filing of further affidavit material.
The court was required to determine two primary legal issues. Firstly, whether the parties met the criteria for a de facto relationship as defined by the *Family Law Act 1975*. Secondly, if a de facto relationship was found to exist, the court needed to ascertain the date on which that relationship concluded.
Cronin J declared that, pursuant to s 90RD of the *Family Law Act 1975*, the applicant and respondent were in a de facto relationship for the purposes of an order under s 90SG. Furthermore, the court found that the parties' relationship ended in November 2009, satisfying the requirements of s 90RD(2)(d) and s 90SG. The court also made orders for the adjournment of outstanding interim applications, directed the respondent to pay a sum of $3000 to the applicant, and set a deadline for the filing of further affidavit material.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Moby & Schulter [2009] FamCA 1285
Most Recent Citation
Dandridge and Barron [2012] FMCAfam 141
Cases Citing This Decision
7
Gates and Gates
[2013] FamCA 798
Ting & Fingal
[2013] FamCA 29
Cleary and Sarno
[2018] FCCA 96
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1