| [2021] FWCA 4043 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
MJ Smith Ground Preparation Pty Ltd
(AG2021/5751)
MJ SMITH GROUND PREPARATION PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT ASBURY | BRISBANE, 9 JULY 2021 |
Application for approval of the MJ Smith Ground Preparation Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2021.
[1] MJ Smith Ground Preparation Pty Ltd (the Applicant) applies to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Mj Smith Ground Preparation Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] Undertakings were provided by the Applicant in response to concerns the Commission held in relation to the operation of certain clauses and whether the Agreement passes the better off overall test. A copy of the Undertakings is attached as Annexure A to this decision. I am satisfied that the effect of accepting the Undertakings is not likely to:
(a) cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement; or
(b) result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] The views of each person or organisation the Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings. Pursuant to subsection 190(3) of the Act, I accept the Undertakings. In accordance with s.201(3) of the Act, a copy of the undertakings will be attached to the Agreement and forms part of the Agreement.
[4] I observe that the following clauses may be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
• Clause 15.4 – Annual Leave;
• Clause 15.8 – Annual Leave;
• Clause 15.11 – Annual Leave;
• Clause 16.5 – Paid Personal/Carer’s Leave;
• Clause 18.2 – Public Holidays; and
• Clause 24.6 – Notice of termination.
[5] However, I note clause 5.2 of the Agreement provides that where there is an inconsistency between a provision of the Agreement and the NES, and the NES provides a greater benefit, the NES provision will apply to the extent of the inconsistency. On this basis, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES. I also note that by virtue of s. 55 of the Act, an enterprise agreement must not exclude the NES or any provisions of the NES and s. 56 provides that a term of an enterprise agreement has no effect to the extent that it contravenes s. 55.
[6] The Applicant made an error by commencing the vote on the seventh day of the access period for the Agreement. As a result of this error, the vote for the Agreement occurred before the conclusion of the access period required by s.180(3) of the Act. Having regard to the decision of the Full Bench in Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others, I am satisfied that this is a minor procedural or technical error and that pursuant to s. 188(2)(a) of the Act I can be satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed but for that minor error. In this regard, I am satisfied that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to be disadvantaged by the error. I have also had regard to the fact that 33 employees covered by the Agreement voted and 32 employees voted to approve the Agreement. Accordingly, there is no basis for finding that the error had any bearing on the outcome of the ballot to approve the Agreement.
[7] I am satisfied, on the basis of information set out in the Form F16 Application for approval of an enterprise agreement, the Form F17 Employer’s declaration in support of an application for approval of the Agreement and responses to requests for further information provided by the Applicant, that each of the requirements of ss. l86, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account s.186(3) and (3A), and on the basis of the information contained in the Form F17, I am satisfied that the group of employees covered by the Agreement was fairly chosen.
[8] The Agreement is approved in accordance with s.54 of the Act and will operate from 16 July 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 9 July 2025.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE512185 PR731560>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- MJ Smith Ground Preparation Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 4043
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 4043
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement was made in good faith, whether it provided for a fair and reasonable method of determining wages and other conditions, and whether it complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. Additionally, the Commission needed to consider whether the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of both the employer and employees, and whether it adhered to the principles of enterprise bargaining.
The Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and provided for a fair and reasonable method of determining wages and other conditions. It concluded that the agreement balanced the interests of both parties and complied with the Fair Work Act. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement met the necessary criteria for approval, including that it provided for the protection of employees' rights and interests. Consequently, the Fair Work Commission approved the MJ Smith Ground Preparation Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2021.
The final orders of the Commission included the approval of the agreement, which would now govern the terms and conditions of employment for the employees of MJ Smith Ground Preparation Pty Ltd. The agreement was to be registered with the Fair Work Commission, and the parties were directed to comply with its terms. The decision underscored the importance of good faith bargaining and the need for agreements to appropriately balance the interests of both employers and employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.