Mitford and Cilea

The matter of *Mitford and Cilea* concerned an application by the husband to permanently stay an Enforcement Warrant filed on 13 October 2017, before Tree J. The wife was the respondent to this application.

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the Enforcement Warrant should be permanently stayed. Ancillary to this, the Court was required to consider the husband's oral application for an indemnity costs order against the wife.

The Court ordered that the Enforcement Warrant be permanently stayed. The Court also made detailed orders regarding the timeline for the parties to file and serve material and written submissions concerning the husband's application for an indemnity costs order, with the decision on costs to be reserved.