Mirren and Mirren (No 2)

The applicant, Mirren, sought a stay of orders previously made by the court on 14 August 2019, in a matter involving the respondent, also named Mirren. The application was heard by Wilson J.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant a stay of the existing orders. This required the court to consider the principles governing the grant of a stay, particularly in the context of the applicant's circumstances and the potential impact of granting or refusing the stay.

Wilson J dismissed the application for a stay. The reasoning for this decision is not detailed in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that the applicant failed to satisfy the necessary legal threshold for a stay to be granted. The court ordered the applicant to pay the respondent's costs associated with the stay application.