Minogue v State of Victoria
Case
•
[2019] HCATrans 63
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Minogue v State of Victoria [2019] HCATrans 63
[2019] HCATrans 63
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The parties in this matter were Craig William John Minogue (the plaintiff) and the State of Victoria (the defendant). The dispute concerned a special case filed by the parties, which was referred for hearing by the Full Court of the High Court of Australia.
The primary legal issue before the Court was the procedural step of referring the special case for hearing by a Full Court, as provided for by rule 25.09.3(d) of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth). The Court also considered the appropriate timetable for the filing of submissions and the preparation of court materials, including the special case book and the joint book of authorities.
The Court's reasoning focused on the agreement between the parties regarding the proposed directions. Both the plaintiff and the defendant supported the proposed orders, which included an extension of time for filing submissions and the referral of the special case to a Full Court. The Court noted a "change of attitude" and "change of instructions" from the defendant, indicating that new information about the plaintiff's case had become available, influencing the defendant's position. The Court then made orders reflecting this agreement.
The Court ordered that the special case be referred to a Full Court for hearing. It also vacated a previous order, set deadlines for the plaintiff to file submissions in reply, and established specific dates for the defendant to file and serve the special case book and the joint book of authorities. Costs were reserved.
The primary legal issue before the Court was the procedural step of referring the special case for hearing by a Full Court, as provided for by rule 25.09.3(d) of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth). The Court also considered the appropriate timetable for the filing of submissions and the preparation of court materials, including the special case book and the joint book of authorities.
The Court's reasoning focused on the agreement between the parties regarding the proposed directions. Both the plaintiff and the defendant supported the proposed orders, which included an extension of time for filing submissions and the referral of the special case to a Full Court. The Court noted a "change of attitude" and "change of instructions" from the defendant, indicating that new information about the plaintiff's case had become available, influencing the defendant's position. The Court then made orders reflecting this agreement.
The Court ordered that the special case be referred to a Full Court for hearing. It also vacated a previous order, set deadlines for the plaintiff to file submissions in reply, and established specific dates for the defendant to file and serve the special case book and the joint book of authorities. Costs were reserved.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0