Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources v Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2004] FCA 694


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources v Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd

[2004] FCA 694

THE MINISTER FOR INDUSTRY, TOURISM AND RESOURCES v MOBIL OIL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
N 1593 OF 2003

GYLES J

31 MAY 2004
SYDNEY

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 1593 OF 2003

BETWEEN:

THE MINISTER FOR INDUSTRY, TOURISM AND RESOURCES
APPLICANT

AND:

MOBIL OIL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

GYLES J

DATE OF ORDER:

31 MAY 2004

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT DECLARES THAT:

The respondent has, in contravention of s 10(2) of the Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Act 1980 (the Sites Act), during the period from January 1998 to January 2000 (inclusive) operated retail sites such that the aggregate of the sites each month operated by the respondent in excess of the permissible number of retail sites specified in the Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Regulations (the Sites Regulations) was 563.

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. The respondent whether by its directors, employees, agents or otherwise be restrained for a period of six (6) months from the date of these Orders from acquiring equity in any corporation so that by that acquisition the respondent becomes by virtue of the deeming provisions in s 4 of the Sites Act, a related body corporate to that corporation and the respondent thereby operates retail sites exceeding the permissible number of retail sites specified in the Sites Regulations.

2. The respondent pay to the Commonwealth a pecuniary penalty of $844,500 pursuant to s 13 of the Sites Act in respect of the conduct referred to in the above declaration.

3. The respondent shall implement, maintain and audit a compliance program in the terms of annexure ‘A’ to the Application in this proceeding to reduce the risk of a repeat of breaches of s 10 of the Sites Act.

4.   The respondent cause to be published in the Australian Convenience Store News in its next available edition following the making of this Order, a notice in the form of Annexure ‘B’ to the Application in this proceeding.

5.   The respondent pay the applicant’s costs as taxed or agreed.

Note:   Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 1593 OF 2003

BETWEEN:

THE MINISTER FOR INDUSTRY, TOURISM AND RESOURCES
APPLICANT

AND:

MOBIL OIL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

GYLES J

DATE:

31 MAY 2004

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. The essential features of the case are dealt with in two judgments – Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources v Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 1454 and Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources v Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 72. The issue left outstanding in my previous judgment was the fixing of penalties. The authorities which are relevant to the fixing of penalties were discussed in argument in the Full Court and most, if not all, are referred to in the Full Court judgment. I need not repeat the essential features of the case nor recite the authorities again.

  2. Having re-examined the agreed facts and the submissions of both parties in accordance with the decision of the Full Court in this case, I am satisfied that the amount of $844,500 is an appropriate penalty to impose in total for the 563 contraventions of the Petroleum Retail Marketing Sites Act 1980 (Cth) which have been admitted.

I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Gyles.

Associate:

Dated:            31 May 2004

Counsel for the Applicant:

M Painter

Solicitor for the Applicant:

Australian Government Solicitor

Counsel for the Respondent:

T North SC and MR Speakman

Solicitor for the Respondent:

Blake Dawson Waldron

Date of Hearing:

3 December 2003

Date of Judgment:

31 May 2004

Details
AGLC
Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources v Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 694
Case
[2004] FCA 694
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources brought an action against Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd in the Federal Court of Australia, seeking relief from breaches of the Sites Act. The Minister alleged that Mobil Oil had contravened the Act by operating more than the permitted number of retail sites. Mobil Oil argued that it had not intentionally breached the Act and that the Minister's claims were without merit. The legal issues in the case included whether Mobil Oil had indeed exceeded the allowable number of retail sites, whether the Minister's claims were valid, and what remedies were appropriate if Mobil Oil had indeed breached the Act. The court found that Mobil Oil had indeed operated more retail sites than permitted by the Act and Regulations, and that the Minister's claims were valid. The court determined that an appropriate remedy would be an injunction preventing Mobil Oil from acquiring equity in any corporation that would result in it operating more than the permitted number of retail sites for six months, a penalty payment of $844,500, and the implementation of a compliance program and public notice of the court's decision. The court's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the evidence presented and the applicable statutory provisions.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The respondent whether by its directors, employees, agents or otherwise be restrained for a period of six (6) months from the date of these Orders from acquiring equity in any corporation so that by that acquisition the respondent becomes by virtue of the deeming provisions in s 4 of the Sites Act, a related body corporate to that corporation and the respondent thereby operates retail sites exceeding the permissible number of retail sites specified in the Sites Regulations.

2. The respondent pay to the Commonwealth a pecuniary penalty of $844,500 pursuant to s 13 of the Sites Act in respect of the conduct referred to in the above declaration.

3. The respondent shall implement, maintain and audit a compliance program in the terms of annexure ‘A’ to the Application in this proceeding to reduce the risk of a repeat of breaches of s 10 of the Sites Act.

4. The respondent cause to be published in the Australian Convenience Store News in its next available edition following the making of this Order, a notice in the form of Annexure ‘B’ to the Application in this proceeding.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.