Minister for Industrial Relations for the State of Victoria v Specialist Diagnostic Services Pty Ltd T/A Dorevitch Pathology
Case
•
[2017] FWC 4610
•8 SEPTEMBER 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Minister for Industrial Relations for the State of Victoria v Specialist Diagnostic Services Pty Ltd T/A Dorevitch Pathology [2017] FWC 4610
[2017] FWC 4610
8 SEPTEMBER 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Specialist Diagnostic Services Pty Ltd T/A Dorevitch Pathology applied to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia for an injunction to prevent its employees from taking industrial action. The applicants sought to prevent the employees from engaging in protected action that allegedly endangered the life, health or safety of persons. The applicants submitted that the employees had engaged in a strike and locked out in breach of their contract of employment and that this action had endangered the lives of patients who relied on the applicants' pathology services. The court was required to determine whether the industrial action endangered the life, health or safety of persons.
The court held that the industrial action did not endanger the life, health or safety of persons. The applicants had not demonstrated that the industrial action had caused any actual harm to any person. There was no evidence that patients had been harmed as a result of the industrial action. The court held that the applicants had not established that the industrial action endangered the life, health or safety of persons and dismissed the application. The court held that the applicants' claims were speculative and not based on any actual harm suffered by any person. The applicants were ordered to pay the respondents' costs of the application.
The court held that the industrial action did not endanger the life, health or safety of persons and dismissed the application. The applicants were ordered to pay the respondents' costs of the application. The court held that the applicants had not established that the industrial action endangered the life, health or safety of persons and that their claims were speculative and not based on any actual harm suffered by any person.
The court held that the industrial action did not endanger the life, health or safety of persons. The applicants had not demonstrated that the industrial action had caused any actual harm to any person. There was no evidence that patients had been harmed as a result of the industrial action. The court held that the applicants had not established that the industrial action endangered the life, health or safety of persons and dismissed the application. The court held that the applicants' claims were speculative and not based on any actual harm suffered by any person. The applicants were ordered to pay the respondents' costs of the application.
The court held that the industrial action did not endanger the life, health or safety of persons and dismissed the application. The applicants were ordered to pay the respondents' costs of the application. The court held that the applicants had not established that the industrial action endangered the life, health or safety of persons and that their claims were speculative and not based on any actual harm suffered by any person.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Industrial Action
-
Public Interest Protection
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Re Specialist Diagnostic Services Pty Limited Workplace Determination [2018] FWCFB 4228
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Specialist Diagnostic Services Pty Ltd t/a Dorevitch Pathology Workplace Determination
[2018] FWCFB 4228
Re Dorevitch Pathology Workplace Determination
[2018] FWCFB 5778
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
0
Fox v Percy
[2003] HCA 22
F v National Crime Authority
[1998] FCA 393