Mining and Energy Union v Centennial Mandalong Pty Limited

Case [2024] FWC 2268


[2024] FWC 2268

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Mining and Energy Union
v

Centennial Mandalong Pty Limited

(B2024/1078)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 23 AUGUST 2024

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Centennial Mandalong Pty Limited

  1. This is an application by Mining and Energy Union[1] (MEU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Centennial Mandalong Pty Limited (Mandalong or Employer).

  1. On 23 August 2024, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Jeremy McWilliams, District Vice President, setting out the steps taken by the MEU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Mandalong, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of  the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 6 September 2024.[2] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. The structure of the draft order has been amended to reflect the Fair Work Commission’s standard template.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR778611.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] The application was brought in the name of the Mining and Energy Union Northern Mining and NSW Energy District Branch.

[2] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR778612>

Details
AGLC
Mining and Energy Union v Centennial Mandalong Pty Limited [2024] FWC 2268
Case
[2024] FWC 2268
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission heard an application by the Mining and Energy Union (MEU) under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009, seeking a protected action ballot order concerning employees of Centennial Mandalong Pty Limited (Mandalong). The MEU applied for a ballot to authorise potential industrial action, citing an inability to reach agreement with Mandalong over a proposed enterprise agreement. Mandalong, the employer, did not object to the application, prompting the Commission to proceed with the matter on the submitted documents without a hearing.

The legal issues before the Commission involved verifying whether the MEU had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Mandalong and if all statutory requirements for conducting a ballot were met. The MEU provided a declaration from Jeremy McWilliams, the District Vice President, detailing the union's bargaining efforts and commitment to reaching an agreement. The Commission needed to determine if the notification period for the proposed agreement was valid and if the statutory prerequisites under section 443(1) of the Act were satisfied.

The Deputy President Hampton concluded that the MEU had genuinely endeavoured to negotiate with Mandalong, as evidenced by the declaration. All requirements for the ballot were met, including the notification time and compliance with section 443(1) of the Act. Consequently, the Commission granted the MEU's application. The ballot was to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), which is an approved agent under section 468A of the Act. The voting period was set to close on 6 September 2024, effectively establishing the ballot period. The Commission also determined that the matter would proceed to a compulsory conciliation conference under section 448A, with another Member of the Commission overseeing the process.

The final order mandated that a ballot be held by CiVS for the MEU's proposed industrial action, with voting to close on 6 September 2024. Additionally, the matter was referred for a compulsory conciliation conference to facilitate further negotiations between the parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.