MILLIGAN & THURGOOD

The parties to this proceeding were Milligan & Thurgood (the applicants) and the respondent, whose identity is not specified in the provided text. The dispute concerned an application for an order for possession of premises. The matter came before Obradovic J in the Supreme Court of Victoria.

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the applicants were entitled to an order for possession of the premises. This involved determining whether the respondent had breached the terms of their occupancy, thereby entitling the applicants to regain possession.

Obradovic J considered the evidence presented and the relevant legal principles governing possession of property. The judgment focused on the contractual or statutory rights and obligations of the parties in relation to the premises. The Court's reasoning would have addressed the specific grounds upon which possession was sought and whether those grounds were established to the Court's satisfaction.

The provided text does not specify the final orders or outcome of the application.