MILLHOUSE & MULLENS
Case
•
[2018] FamCA 1022
•29 January 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
MILLHOUSE & MULLENS [2018] FamCA 1022
[2018] FamCA 1022
29 January 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Millhouse & Mullens*, heard before Carew J, the applicant sought interim orders for the valuation of a trust and its real property. The respondent sought costs on a party/party basis in relation to this interim application, to be paid within 14 days of the making of a final order in the property settlement proceedings.
The central legal issue before the court was whether to grant the interim order for the valuation of the trust and its assets. A secondary issue concerned the respondent's application for costs of the interim application.
Carew J dismissed the application for the valuation of the trust, finding that the prospect of the trust being a relevant asset or financial resource in the determination of the substantive proceedings was remote. Consequently, the court also ordered that the respondent be paid costs of the interim application on a party/party basis, with those costs to be paid within 14 days of the making of a final order in the property settlement proceedings.
The central legal issue before the court was whether to grant the interim order for the valuation of the trust and its assets. A secondary issue concerned the respondent's application for costs of the interim application.
Carew J dismissed the application for the valuation of the trust, finding that the prospect of the trust being a relevant asset or financial resource in the determination of the substantive proceedings was remote. Consequently, the court also ordered that the respondent be paid costs of the interim application on a party/party basis, with those costs to be paid within 14 days of the making of a final order in the property settlement proceedings.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Equity & Trusts
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
MILLHOUSE & MULLENS [2018] FamCA 1022
Cases Citing This Decision
0