MILLHOUSE & MILLHOUSE

In the matter of *Millhouse & Millhouse*, Benjamin J of the Family Court of Australia considered a dispute between the parties. The precise nature of the dispute is not detailed, but the proceedings concluded with the making of consent orders.

The court was required to determine the terms of the consent orders to be made between the parties. Additionally, the court was required to consider the inclusion of specific particulars regarding the obligations created by the orders, the consequences of contravention, and information on assistance for compliance, as mandated by sections 65DA(2) and 62B of the relevant legislation. The court also had to certify whether it was reasonable to engage counsel to attend the proceedings, pursuant to Rule 19.50 of the Family Law Rules 2004.

Benjamin J made orders in accordance with a minute of consent signed by the parties and initialled by the court. These orders incorporated the particulars required by sections 65DA(2) and 62B, including details of obligations, consequences of contravention, and sources of assistance. The court certified that it was reasonable to engage counsel to attend.