Millhouse and Mullens
Case
•
[2017] FamCA 37
•27 January 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Millhouse and Mullens [2017] FamCA 37
[2017] FamCA 37
27 January 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Millhouse and Mullens*, Hogan J of the Supreme Court of Victoria was required to determine an application concerning costs. The specific nature of the underlying dispute between the parties, Millhouse and Mullens, is not detailed, but the proceedings before the Court related to an Amended Application in a Case filed on 4 August 2015.
The central legal issue before Hogan J was the disposition of costs following the dismissal of the Amended Application in a Case. The Court was tasked with determining whether to make any orders regarding the costs incurred by the parties in relation to that dismissed application, and if so, the procedure for addressing such applications.
Hogan J ordered that the Amended Application in a Case filed on 4 August 2015 be dismissed. In relation to costs, the Court established a detailed, multi-stage process for any party seeking to recover costs. This process involved the filing and service of initial submissions, followed by a period for answering submissions, and a final opportunity for reply submissions, all to be considered by the Court in Chambers.
The central legal issue before Hogan J was the disposition of costs following the dismissal of the Amended Application in a Case. The Court was tasked with determining whether to make any orders regarding the costs incurred by the parties in relation to that dismissed application, and if so, the procedure for addressing such applications.
Hogan J ordered that the Amended Application in a Case filed on 4 August 2015 be dismissed. In relation to costs, the Court established a detailed, multi-stage process for any party seeking to recover costs. This process involved the filing and service of initial submissions, followed by a period for answering submissions, and a final opportunity for reply submissions, all to be considered by the Court in Chambers.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Millhouse and Mullens [2017] FamCA 37
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
1
Paris King Investments Pty Ltd v Rayhill
[2006] NSWSC 578
Strahan v Strahan
[2019] HCASL 327