| [2015] FWCA 1422 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Millcon Pty Ltd T/A Millcon
(AG2015/19)
MILLCON PTY LTD EMPLOYEE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2014
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 3 MARCH 2015 |
Application for approval of the Millcon Pty Ltd Employee Collective Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known asthe Millcon Pty Ltd Employee Collective Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Millcon Pty Ltd t/a Millcon (the Applicant). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 3 March 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE412841 PR561523>
- AGLC
- Millcon Pty Ltd T/A Millcon [2015] FWCA 1422
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 1422
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the provisions in the collective agreement complied with the relevant sections of the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically sections concerning the interests of employees and the protection against unfair dismissal. The Commission had to determine if the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, considering factors such as the nature of the employment, the terms and conditions of employment, and the rights and obligations of the parties.
In evaluating the agreement, the Commission examined the specific clauses in question and considered submissions from both Millcon and the Electrical Trades Union of Australia. It found that while some provisions did not align with the best interests of the employees, the overall agreement was fair and balanced. The Commission approved the collective agreement with the condition that certain amendments be made to specific clauses to better protect employee interests. These amendments included adjustments to the shift patterns and overtime provisions to ensure they complied with the Act.
The Commission's final orders required Millcon to implement the approved collective agreement with the specified amendments within 28 days of the decision. The Electrical Trades Union of Australia's opposition was dismissed, and the application for approval of the collective agreement was granted subject to the conditions outlined by the Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.