Mile v The King
Case
•
[2023] SASCA 33
•30 March 2023
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Mile v The King [2023] SASCA 33
[2023] SASCA 33
30 March 2023
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The parties to this matter were Mile (the appellant) and The King (the respondent). The dispute concerned an appeal against a sentence imposed on the appellant. The appeal was heard by the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia, comprising Livesey P, Doyle and David JJ.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the sentence imposed on the appellant was manifestly excessive, thereby providing grounds for interference on appeal.
The Court considered the grounds of appeal, finding that one ground was reasonably arguable. Despite this, the Court ultimately determined that the appeal against the sentence on the basis of manifest excess should be dismissed.
Permission to appeal was granted, but the appeal itself was dismissed.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the sentence imposed on the appellant was manifestly excessive, thereby providing grounds for interference on appeal.
The Court considered the grounds of appeal, finding that one ground was reasonably arguable. Despite this, the Court ultimately determined that the appeal against the sentence on the basis of manifest excess should be dismissed.
Permission to appeal was granted, but the appeal itself was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Sentencing
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Mile v The King [2023] SASCA 33
Most Recent Citation
Brougham v The King [2023] SASCA 75
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Millwood v The King
[2024] SASCA 84
Ericson v The King
[2023] SASCA 99
Wakefield v The King
[2023] SASCA 95
Cases Cited
30
Statutory Material Cited
1
Pollitt v Police
[2007] SASC 382
MILE v Police
[2007] SASC 156
R v De Simoni
[1981] HCA 31