Milas v GM Holden Ltd (No.2)
Case
•
[2015] FCCA 1506
•4 June 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Milas v GM Holden Ltd (No.2) [2015] FCCA 1311
[2015] FCCA 1506
4 June 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Milas and GM Holden Ltd were parties to a dispute before the Supreme Court of South Australia. The proceedings concerned a claim for damages for personal injury arising from a motor vehicle accident.
The central legal issue before the Court was the assessment of damages, specifically the appropriate method for calculating the plaintiff's loss of earning capacity. This involved determining whether the plaintiff's pre-accident earning capacity should be assessed by reference to his actual earnings or by reference to what he might have earned in a different, more lucrative occupation.
Judge O'Sullivan reasoned that the plaintiff's loss of earning capacity should be assessed by reference to his actual earnings prior to the accident, rather than a hypothetical, more profitable occupation. The Court applied the principle that damages for loss of earning capacity are to compensate for the loss of the ability to earn income, and this ability is best measured by the income the plaintiff was actually earning or was reasonably likely to earn in the future, considering his circumstances and capabilities at the time of the injury. The Court distinguished between a loss of earning capacity and a loss of a specific job, finding that the plaintiff had not demonstrated a reasonable prospect of obtaining employment in the more lucrative field he claimed he might have pursued.
The Court ordered that damages be assessed on the basis of the plaintiff's pre-accident earning capacity.
The central legal issue before the Court was the assessment of damages, specifically the appropriate method for calculating the plaintiff's loss of earning capacity. This involved determining whether the plaintiff's pre-accident earning capacity should be assessed by reference to his actual earnings or by reference to what he might have earned in a different, more lucrative occupation.
Judge O'Sullivan reasoned that the plaintiff's loss of earning capacity should be assessed by reference to his actual earnings prior to the accident, rather than a hypothetical, more profitable occupation. The Court applied the principle that damages for loss of earning capacity are to compensate for the loss of the ability to earn income, and this ability is best measured by the income the plaintiff was actually earning or was reasonably likely to earn in the future, considering his circumstances and capabilities at the time of the injury. The Court distinguished between a loss of earning capacity and a loss of a specific job, finding that the plaintiff had not demonstrated a reasonable prospect of obtaining employment in the more lucrative field he claimed he might have pursued.
The Court ordered that damages be assessed on the basis of the plaintiff's pre-accident earning capacity.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Employment Law
Legal Concepts
-
Abuse of Process
-
Costs
-
Res Judicata
-
Stay of Proceedings
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
15
Statutory Material Cited
3
Milas v GM Holden Limited
[2015] FCCA 1311
Maslen v Core Drilling Services Pty Ltd & Anor (No.2)
[2015] FCCA 290
OLLIE & NORWOOD (No.2)
[2015] FCCA 716