Mikono and Perez (Costs)
Case
•
[2012] FamCA 762
•31 August 2012
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
MIKONO & PEREZ (COSTS)
[2012] FamCA 762
[2012] FamCA 762
31 August 2012
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Mikono and Perez*, Justice Murphy of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia was required to consider an application for costs made by the Independent Children’s Lawyer. The specific nature of the underlying dispute between the parties, Mikono and Perez, is not detailed in the provided text, but the application for costs by the Independent Children’s Lawyer was the central issue before the Court.
The sole legal issue before Justice Murphy was whether to grant the application for costs brought by the Independent Children’s Lawyer. This required the Court to assess the merits of the application and determine if the circumstances warranted an order for costs in favour of the Independent Children’s Lawyer.
Justice Murphy dismissed the application for costs made by the Independent Children’s Lawyer. No specific reasoning or legal principles applied in reaching this decision are provided in the excerpt. The Court’s final order was that the application for costs by the Independent Children’s Lawyer be dismissed.
The sole legal issue before Justice Murphy was whether to grant the application for costs brought by the Independent Children’s Lawyer. This required the Court to assess the merits of the application and determine if the circumstances warranted an order for costs in favour of the Independent Children’s Lawyer.
Justice Murphy dismissed the application for costs made by the Independent Children’s Lawyer. No specific reasoning or legal principles applied in reaching this decision are provided in the excerpt. The Court’s final order was that the application for costs by the Independent Children’s Lawyer be dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
MIKONO & PEREZ (COSTS)
[2012] FamCA 762
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
3
Horn and Gabin (No 3)
[2011] FamCA 817
Penfold v Penfold
[1980] HCA 4
Penfold v Penfold
[1980] HCA 4