Mihajlovic v Lifeline Macarthur
Case
•
[2013] FWC 9804
•16 DECEMBER 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Mihajlovic v Lifeline Macarthur [2013] FWC 9804
[2013] FWC 9804
16 DECEMBER 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Mihajlovic v Lifeline Macarthur was an application for review of a decision of Lifeline Macarthur, an organisation that provides services for people suffering from mental illness. The applicant, Mihajlovic, sought a review of the decision to terminate their employment with Lifeline Macarthur. The matter was heard in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. The primary legal issue before the court was whether the application was lodged out of time. Lifeline Macarthur argued that the application was filed beyond the 28-day period allowed under section 34 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975. Mihajlovic, on the other hand, contended that there were exceptional circumstances that justified the delay in filing the application.
The court examined the relevant statutory provisions and found that there was no provision for extending the time limit for filing an application for internal review. The court held that Mihajlovic failed to provide any evidence or explanation for the delay in lodging the application. Therefore, the application was deemed to be out of time, and the court dismissed the application for review. The court emphasised the importance of strict compliance with statutory time limits and noted that exceptional circumstances must be truly exceptional to warrant an extension of time. The court did not make any orders as the application was dismissed.
The court examined the relevant statutory provisions and found that there was no provision for extending the time limit for filing an application for internal review. The court held that Mihajlovic failed to provide any evidence or explanation for the delay in lodging the application. Therefore, the application was deemed to be out of time, and the court dismissed the application for review. The court emphasised the importance of strict compliance with statutory time limits and noted that exceptional circumstances must be truly exceptional to warrant an extension of time. The court did not make any orders as the application was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Limitation Periods
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Mr Rajendra Ranabhat v Lincoln Brokerage Services Pty. Ltd [2025] FWC 1053
Cases Citing This Decision
74
Cameron Milford v Coles Supply Chain Pty Ltd T/A Coles Heathwood Distribution Centre
[2019] FWCFB 8738
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
0
Visscher v Giudice
[2009] HCA 34
Visscher v Giudice
[2009] HCA 34
Tullett Prebon (Australia) Pty Ltd v Purcell
[2009] NSWSC 1079