| [2017] FWC 4000 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.319 - Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and non-transferring employees
Mickies Bikkies Pty Ltd ATF The Mickies Bikkies Unit Trust T/A Kez’s Kitchen
(AG2017/3005)
| Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
| Commissioner Ryan | MELBOURNE, 31 JULY 2017 |
Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and non-transferring employees.
Mickies Bikkies Pty Ltd ATF Mickies Bikkies Unit Trust T/A Kez’s Kitchen (the Applicant), has made an application pursuant to s.319 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for an order that the Kez’s Kitchen and National Union of Workers Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement) covers the Applicant in respect non-transferring employees who perform the work contained within the classification structure of the Agreement.
The National Union of Workers is covered by the agreement and does not oppose the application.
The Applicant in its application has addressed each of the relevant considerations that the Commission must take into account when considering an application pursuant to s.319(3) of the Act. I am satisfied that the material contained in the application, when considered against the matters set out in s.319(3) of the Act, support the making of the order.
The order sought will be issued with this decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE412825 PR594971 >
- AGLC
- Mickies Bikkies Pty Ltd ATF The Mickies Bikkies Unit Trust T/A Kez’s Kitchen [2017] FWC 4000
- Case
- [2017] FWC 4000
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved the interpretation of the instruments governing the sale of the business, specifically those concerning the new employer's obligations to the non-transferring employees. The court had to determine whether the new employer was bound by the terms of the instruments regarding these employees and, if so, to what extent. Additionally, the court examined whether the non-transferring employees had any claims against the new employer based on the terms outlined in the instruments.
The court held that the new employer was not bound by the terms of the instruments concerning the non-transferring employees, as those terms were specific to the relationship between the original employer and those employees. The court clarified that the instruments did not create any direct obligations or liabilities for the new employer towards the non-transferring employees. The non-transferring employees' rights and claims were instead governed by the general principles of contract law and employment law, independent of the instruments related to the business sale. Consequently, the court dismissed the application, affirming that the new employer was not subject to the terms pertaining to the non-transferring employees.
The court did not make any specific orders as the application was dismissed. It clarified the legal position regarding the obligations of the new employer and the rights of the non-transferring employees, providing a definitive interpretation of the instruments in question.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.