Michos v Eastbrooke Medical Centre Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2020] HCASL 21
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Michos v Eastbrooke Medical Centre Pty Ltd [2020] HCASL 21
[2020] HCASL 21
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of Michos v Eastbrooke Medical Centre Pty Ltd, the applicant sought an extension of time to file an application for special leave to appeal from the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria. The applicant's application concerned a matter of practice and procedure rather than a question of principle. The Court was required to decide whether to grant the applicant's request for an extension of time within which to file the application for special leave to appeal.
The Court noted that the applicant's application raised no question of the application of principle, and there was no reason to question the decision below. The Court found that it would be futile to grant the extension of time sought by the applicant, and hence, special leave should be refused. The Court emphasised that the decision below was not in dispute and that the matter was purely one of practice and procedure. The Court considered it appropriate to direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
The Court concluded that the applicant's request for an extension of time to file an application for special leave to appeal should be refused. The Court dismissed the application and directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria remained undisturbed.
This decision highlights the importance of ensuring that applications for special leave to appeal are made within the prescribed time limits. It also underscores the Court's reluctance to grant extensions of time in cases where the applicant's application raises no question of principle and there is no reason to question the decision below.
The Court noted that the applicant's application raised no question of the application of principle, and there was no reason to question the decision below. The Court found that it would be futile to grant the extension of time sought by the applicant, and hence, special leave should be refused. The Court emphasised that the decision below was not in dispute and that the matter was purely one of practice and procedure. The Court considered it appropriate to direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
The Court concluded that the applicant's request for an extension of time to file an application for special leave to appeal should be refused. The Court dismissed the application and directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria remained undisturbed.
This decision highlights the importance of ensuring that applications for special leave to appeal are made within the prescribed time limits. It also underscores the Court's reluctance to grant extensions of time in cases where the applicant's application raises no question of principle and there is no reason to question the decision below.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Limitation Periods
-
Appeal
-
Special Leave
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Con Michos v Eastbrooke Medical Centres Pty Ltd (ACN 130 596 002) [2020] VSCA 278
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0