Michaels and Reese

Case

[2018] FCCA 617

23 March 2018


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Michaels and Reese [2018] FCCA 617 [2018] FCCA 617 23 March 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of Michaels and Reese concerned parenting orders made by Judge Newbrun in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. The dispute revolved around the arrangements for the children, X and Y, specifically regarding their residence, parental responsibility, and the extent of each parent's involvement in their lives.

The court was required to determine the appropriate orders concerning the children's primary residence, the allocation of parental responsibility, and the nature and extent of the father's ongoing involvement with the children, including access to information about their health and education. The court also had to consider provisions for communication between the parents regarding the children's welfare and any medical emergencies.

Judge Newbrun ordered that the Mother would have sole parental responsibility for the children and that the children would live with her. The children were to spend time with the Father in accordance with their wishes. Crucially, the Father was authorised to request and receive medical reports from the children's treating practitioners at his own cost, detailing symptoms, diagnoses, prescriptions, current treatment, and any requests by the children to contact him. Both parents were ordered to notify each other of medical emergencies promptly and to exchange current contact details, advising of any changes within seven days. The Father was also authorised to obtain school reports and newsletters at his own cost, and the Mother was to notify him of any changes in the children's medical practitioners or schools within seven days, providing contact details. The Mother was also directed to ensure that cards and presents sent by the Father for birthdays and Christmas were given to the children.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

2