Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Michael Lockley v Northern Beaches Council [2018] NSWLEC 1052 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 12 February 2018 Date of orders: 12 February 2018 Decision date: 12 February 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Lockley (Applicant)
Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitor:
David O’Donnell, Addisons Lawyers (Applicant)
Ms Debra Townsend, King & Wood Mallesons (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/259254 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans listed in condition A1 of Annexure “A” to this agreement.
The appeal is upheld.
Development Application No. N0519/16/R, as amended pursuant to paragraph 2(b) above, for the construction of an inclinator at 893 Barrenjoey Road, Palm Beach (Lot 6 DP 13620), is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure “A” to this agreement.
……………………….
Michael Chilcott
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (59.6 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Michael Lockley v Northern Beaches Council [2018] NSWLEC 1052
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1052
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the council's decision was lawful, whether the council followed the necessary procedures, and if the decision was based on proper consideration of relevant factors. Specifically, the court had to determine whether the council's approval process adhered to statutory requirements, including the consideration of environmental impacts and community concerns.
The court held that the council's decision was indeed unlawful. The decision-making process was flawed as the council failed to adequately consider the impact of the subdivision on the local environment and community. The court found that the council did not follow the necessary procedures as required by the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, and thus, the approval of the subdivision was invalid. Consequently, the court ordered the council to review the decision, taking into account the identified shortcomings and to make a new decision in accordance with the law.
In addition to the review direction, the court also granted the declaration sought by Lockley, confirming the invalidity of the council's original decision. The court's final order was that the council was to carry out the review and provide a new decision within a specified timeframe, ensuring compliance with the relevant planning laws and proper procedural requirements.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.